Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Yes ai use consumes water and it’s unnecessary for us to use ai therefore don’t use it. HOWEVER we should also recognize other things we do that use a lot of water such as scrolling on social media or eating meat
11 upvotes, 33 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in Girl Talk. "Yes ai use consumes water and it’s unnecessary for us to use ai therefore don’t use it. HOWEVER we should also recognize other things we do that use a lot of water such as scrolling on social media or eating meat"
upvote 11 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

The huge data centers being built still pollute the surrounding areas, and most are being allowed variances from EPA standards to contaminate beyond what is normally acceptable

upvote 41 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

I’m with op, you guys can’t recognize that she’s on YOUR SIDE, there’s just other activities that use even more water and pollute 😭😭🤦🏽‍♀️

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

no shade imma keep eating meat

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Given the current daily number of queries is 2.5 billion, the daily water used by ChatGPT according to your graph is 8333333.33 repeating.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

as an electronics engineer, this isn’t really how this works. the water cooling systems are running constantly no matter how many queries there are in any given time, unlike the way you can equate x number of cows to x number of beef patties; it is the level of demand for the product that is causing overall detrimental impact and causing new facilities to open, whether your specific query is using them or not. while both are not ideal for the environment, it’s not a 1:1 comparison.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

Respectfully both you are arguing dishonestly and I’m not engaging anymore. My point has been clear from the start that we should recognize the negative affects of all these things

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1w

Yes and data centers are not just used for AI, social media platforms uses them too among other things

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

That doesn’t minimize their effects. Data centers are bad for everyone except the company that bought the land

upvote 27 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I agree.. data centers are bad but also the water consumption in the meat industry is also bad. You agree?

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

I’m just pointing out that data centers are used for more than ai, streaming services rely on them a social media platforms do as well. We should be cognizant of that.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

A bottle of beer and a cup of coffee are also worst than using chat gpt, even a gallon of almond milk can be worse than a hamburger in terms of water consumption. But daily, does chat gpt only take 300 inquiries? Are people usually eating a hamburger daily?

upvote 21 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Ofc people eat less burger than they search on ChatGPT. Thats where the 1 gallon vs 660 gallons comes into play. Why can’t we recognize that both these behaviors carry harm?

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Every behavior carries harm. You didn’t even care to recognize the other stuff I had. But if “one hamburger” has so much water then let’s hope daily that under 198,000 inquiries are made daily.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

It’s not just hamburgers it’s the entire meat industry. The graph just compares hamburger for simplicity. And dairy milk still uses more water than almond milk, but yes I recognize that both use water(all crops use water)

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 1w

Meat will always use more water bc it takes water to produce the feed fed to the animals

post
upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

Also the whole argument about cow’s milk being less “sustainable” than plant milk is in bad faith because it’s clear that a majority of the water is used to water the cow herself, not the production milk like almond or rice.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

The water used to feed the cow ofc should be factored in whattt??? And this graph only factors in hamburgers not the rest of the meat industry. And you fail to recognize the social media and streaming services that use data centers

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

Not telling you to stop babe 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Lmao posts upvoted and comments downvoted is interesting

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

okay bbg

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I literally eat meat

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Except your argument isn’t about streaming services, it’s about ChatGPT queries. Don’t try and make a different point now that someone did the math. The way you slapped the graph of water consumption by milk type out of context shows that you just want people to blindly believe what your posting and not do any research or critical thinking of their own just agree with you.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

That has been my argument babe

post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

It also doesn’t take into account things like how much milk is produced using that amount of water or how many hamburgers come from one cow. Your argument is flawed from start to finish and I’m not gonna sit here and blindly agree because you threw some graphs around.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

jsyk it doesn’t take one cow to make one burger. different types of meat and different cuts of meat exist because they use the whole cow to make the meat not just one part of it 😭

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

I understand that I’ve upset some people by pointing out how their environmentalism is imperfect, but please do not misrepresent my argument. It has always been about ai, social media, steaming, AND the meat industry.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 1w

It’s literally per liter of milk, it is factored in😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1w

Expect that was not the math I did, I did the math for ChatGPT queries. I focused on two of the arguments because that the data I have. Even if it is part of the argument it still doesn’t change the fact that you’re using out of context graphs in your arguments.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1w

which is a lot less than using AI. You’re making like five different arguments

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 1w

I think their point is two things can be true at once. We know AI is bad but also they’re trying to open your eyes to other very daily and routine things that are also bad

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1w

I could be totally wrong but that’s at least what I’m getting from this

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 1w

Yeah I fear OP is right they just wanna be contradictory

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 1w

Thank you😭

upvote 1 downvote