Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
fine line between “allowing someone to take care of you” and allowing someone to control you. that’s what 98% of woman are talking about when they say choice feminism can be dangerous. not delegating chores you don’t want to do.
hottake i think its perfectly acceptable to allow my man to take the reigns in certain aspects of my life. no, i don’t wanna take out the trash. he can. yes, i LOVE when he opens doors for me. im not lessening myself by allowing someone to take care of me
upvote 44 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

i agree 100% but i think media, paranoia, and a need to be hyper independent have blurred that line heavily that some people genuinely think being taken care of and acts of service are control and are demeaning. when that is not always the case.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

“being taken care of” is not the same as acts of service. i take care of my dog because he cannot take care of himself. my mom takes care of her dad because he cannot take care of himself. children are taken care of. i can go on. grown adults are not “taken care of” even when they receive acts of service. a man wanting to “take care of you” so you don’t have to account for your own responsibilities it inherently creates dependence. dependence creates control.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 5w

point being: i don’t necessarily have a problem w the phrasing but women don’t need to be taken care of. they need to be treated as equals. they need to be respected. and with that respect, comes acts of service derives from appreciation. like any other relationship, and it’s not “being taken care of” it’s being shown love.

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5w

“i don’t necessarily have a problem with the phrasing, but here are my two paragraphs of problems i have with the phrasing” we don’t need to be nitpicking other women for what feminism means to them. you know what she meant.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

… i have a problem with actual dependence, i don’t vehemently hate the phrasing, but i do want to criticize what it can be seen as communicating to other women. hence my critique. so yeah, i am nitpicking, but i think i’ve been respectful. feminism isn’t about what it means to me or another women. it is about women’s equality & liberation. end of. if you’d like to discuss why choice feminism is harmful, feel free to explore many other women’s novels & essays on the subject.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 5w

pardon me for being too woke for the function, but it’s my own post that #1 commented on, and i can reply if i’d like to if i’m being respectful & communicating important ideas i have.

upvote 8 downvote