Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
What’s with men and shaking babies
6 upvotes, 48 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in Girl Talk. "What’s with men and shaking babies"
upvote 6 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

they dk how to take care of children

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Shaken baby syndrome is more than just not knowing how to take care of them. You need to be purposefully and forcefully hurting your child, it’s a male violence issue

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

(Correcting my comment based off research) Because mothers make more of a connection. But this article is using a bit of misleading language. Most cases of SBS are committed by parents. Mother and fathers alike. So sadly yes fathers shake their babies more than mothers do. It’s fathers>boyfriends> babysitters with female babysitters taking an alarming high statistic> mothers being around 12%

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 4w

they know they just don’t care

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Shaken baby syndrome isnt actually mostly done out of wanting to hurt and cause harm. It’s an act of violent desperation wanting the crying to stop. It happens when a parent or partner has been exposed to prolonged crying which by design is supposed to trigger humans into a mode of anxiety to trigger us into wanting to soothe the child to meet its needs. Sadly when it comes to parents committing the crime it is done because lack of sleep plays a huge factor

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Since you deleted your comment, can you please tell me what about this is misleading? Obviously parents are going to shake their babies more than non-parents, considering they are with him a majority of the time. Your comment made no sense

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

I genuinely don’t understand how it’s misleading

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Violence out of desperation or sleeplessness is still violence

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

I was saying the way it was worded was misleading. By arrangement. I’m an English major who has taken two statistics courses as well as a class in nonfiction writing. I rewrote it to recorrect a sentence but it should have been written more like “alarmingly most who commit SBS are fathers and the mother’s boyfriends.” It’s a horrible issue but some times statistical data is written to get even more of a reaction out of readers

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Fathers and the mother’s boyfriends = adult males

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

Yes it’s violence, it’s not okay but it’s not the same kind of violence that we typically associate with men. It’s not coming from a place of wanting to be in power

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Misleading was a poor choice of words, i explained how it could be used to invoke a reaction rather than flatly laying out data.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

But fathers and the mother’s boyfriends are considered to be adult males 😭😭😭 I still don’t get how that’s misleading because they didn’t break it down by social roles

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Yes you can say “adult males” but adding “even more alarming” after is to invoke a reaction, simply by the structure of writing.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

I clarified how it is written to provoke a reaction instead of flat data. Like I said I’ve taken multiple courses on writing in this style.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

I’m not arguing the data I’m arguing the writing structure

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

Personally, I think it would provoke a reaction either way considering that fathers/boyfriends are the same thing as adult males but okay

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

Omg ur not listening to me. Yes they are adult males. Yes boyfriends and fathers are adult males. Yes it is horrible. But the writing was purposefully structured to provoke a harder reaction towards the data. Which when reading papers is simply what you look for when trying to spot authors bias. When I say finding bias I am not saying that it is okay or not horrible that men are shaking babies. I am not trying to provoke a not all men statement. I am simply pointing out something.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 4w

no they genuinely don’t know but they don’t care to ever know. it doesn’t bother them

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

No one said this was an excerpt from a scientific study or peer reviewed article. Writing is allowed to have bias sometimes

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

no, they know. its not rocket science to not shake a baby with such force. they know better

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

Men aren’t helpless babies. They are grown ass adults

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 4w

I just don’t see how stating the obvious, that boyfriends and husbands are males, was purposefully structured to “provoke a harder reaction towards the data“. I would have the same reaction either way and most people would. I don’t understand how that’s bias

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

I can see how “not surprisingly” and “more alarming” would be considered biased wording, but my prior point about it not needing to be nonbiased stands

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

just cause they’re grown on the outside doesn’t mean they’re mentally grown tho

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 4w

That I understand, but I think that’s the normal person’s reaction to this type of data

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

Awe you right 🥺🥺🥺 they don’t know any better poor guys 😢😢😢

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

i’m not pitying them, i’m literally calling them stupid lol. cant even hate men without actually hating men on here, that’s crazy

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

Because this isn’t an issue of “They genuinely don’t know” or whatever. This is an issue of systemic of violence caused by misogyny. They know.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

it’s kinda like that’s society’s fault because it’s been ingrained that we have to stay home with the kids while they go work. i’m not dumb, i literally am a product of that dynamic and it fucking sucks but it’s not just misogyny. to say it is, is completely ignorant of a larger issue which simply revolves around the idea of the structure of family.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

The whole idea in society that we have to stay home with kids while they go to work is literally bc of misogyny what the fuck are you talking about

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

no it’s not only misogyny. it’s literally a product of practical survival roles, learn your history before you flap your jaw so carelessly

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

1. Didn’t say that it was “only misogyny”. Don’t know where you got that from. 2. These days, the whole women stay home and take care of the kids while men work is a patriarchal view, fueled by misogyny.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

“the whole idea that we have to stay at home with kids while they go to work is literally bc of misogyny” girl do you even know or remember what you said cause your phrasing is saying you implied it was only misogyny. learn to articulate your speech better momma, you’re confusing

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

Also the “idea of the structure of a family” that you were talking about is literally just a western view of the average white/European family unit. Especially in some indigenous communities, the family structure is completely different from the family structure that me and you are familiar with

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

speak for yourself babe, my family is eastern european. both my dad and my mom grew up with all their surviving generations under the same house so mess me with that bullshit, acting like you know me

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

So you’re white lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

yes, i am. your point?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

I said that the “idea of the structure of a family“ where the mom stays home and takes care of the kids and the dad works, is a white/European idea and that communities, specifically indigenous communities, have different family structures. Then you said that you were Eastern European for no reason at all 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

because your idea of what’s a white and european family is wrong because that’s not my reality? where my parents are from, it’s normal that their grandparents and great grandparents and pretty much the entire family tree that’s alive all live under the same roof. that’s common throughout eastern europe, so no i didn’t say i’m eastern european for “no reason at all”. come on girl, i know you’re not THAT stupid that you’re not able to put all that together.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

if anything this just shows how americanized your opinions are in terms of what makes a family. looks like you’re the one who needs a reality check.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

How was it wrong? You had a mom, dad, and your parents had a mom and a dad, when some communities don’t even have parents like that. Some communities, the whole tribe is a family, rather than just the people you were genetically closest to. Just because you lived with your immediate family under one roof, doesn’t change the traditional family unit I was talking about.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

If anything, living with your whole immediate family under one roof is more of a traditional European family unit than just living with a mom and dad like here in America. Also, there are plenty of families in America where their immediate family all live under the same roof.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

who said it was wrong? and no, grandparents and great grandparents are not immediate family. so what’s wrong with me being white than? you just proved my point that your ideas of family are american. my mom stayed at home, i literally am not emotionally close because my dad had to work as out of the house every hour, every day. because they’re immigrants and they came to this country with nothing. so mess me with that “so you’re white” nonsense.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

Legally speaking, grandparents are considered immediate family in America at least. I said you were white because when I mentioned that the average family unit that you were describing is a European/white idea, you mentioned you were Eastern European. I took that as you saying that eastern Europeans aren’t white. Your family has the exact family structure that I was talking about.

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

i don’t know any american that has all generations living under the same roof. you’re the one making white as the default in this country. i never said eastern europeans aren’t white, i’m saying my familial circumstances and what is considered normal for me is because i was raised by my eastern european immigrant parents and also got to be raised in the same nuclear family dynamic they had too for a bit early on in my life in guess where eastern europe

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 4w

So just because you don’t know any Americans that have all generations living under the same roof means there are any? 😭😭😭 it is most definitely a thing here in America especially in more poor rural areas. You said that the mom staying with the kids and Dad working roles are a “a product of practical survival roles” which is not true. That idea is specifically European/white. There are plenty of communities on this earth that don’t follow that kind of family unit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

holy moly you are more dense than i imagined. i give you an inch you take a mile, is there something you won’t straw man or exaggerate? it is a product of practical survival roles, that’s literally where the idea of hunters and scavengers come from. and yea, guess what, i grew up in a poor rural area, my family was one of the only white families there. we had no choice bc my fam moved here w/nothing. idk anyone who does bc i don’t live in that area anymore. seriously what is your damage?

upvote 1 downvote