Anonymous #1 5w

I never said that but she’s way too young

-6

Anonymous slutty_anakin 5w

Good for you

-4

Anonymous OP 5w

she’s not too young to adopt a kid based on the laws in the US and how old do you have to be.

15

Anonymous #1 5w

Im not going off the laws, just saying they NEVER let anyone adopt an infant that young unless it’s family

-6

Anonymous OP 5w

you care way too much about a life that isn’t yours. y’all get mad when people have their own biological children and you tell them to adopt instead… then you turn around and get mad at them for adopting. pick a goddamn lane 😭

18

Anonymous #1 5w

Yes I do care about other lives thank you very much Who is yall? I much rather she’d give birth herself than adopt, I don’t know who yall is

-4

Anonymous OP 5w

did you ever consider that maybe birth thing wasn’t an option for her?

25

Anonymous OP 5w

if the infant is in a safe home, with all of the love and care possible it can receive then i don’t see the issue.

14

Anonymous #3 5w

HEAVY ON THIS

15

Anonymous #3 5w

Okay and? Doesn’t make what she’s doing right

-6

Anonymous OP 5w

she’s not doing anything wrong though ???

15

Anonymous #1 5w

You don’t see an issue with an infant being separated from their mother so that a rich 21 yo can have a baby?

-4

Anonymous OP 5w

are you so dumb?

17

Anonymous #3 5w

No. I am not so dumb

-4

Anonymous OP 5w

if the mother of the adopted child put her up for adoption and chose millie to be the mother, then no. consent was clearly involved with this. it’s not like millie stole the child from them 😭

14

Anonymous #1 5w

That’s not how the American adoption industry actually works. Coercion is involved more often than not

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

okay so are you also anti surrogacy and anti safe haven boxes too then ???

7

Anonymous #1 5w

Yeah I’m against the billionaire dollar for profit American adoption industry that treats babies like dolls for rich ppl

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

that’s not what i’m asking tho. i’m asking are you against surrogacy and safe haven boxes?

14

Anonymous #1 5w

Yes, I’m against industry that treats babies like dolls…

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

so if someone can’t have kids and they want them, what’s your solution?

8

Anonymous #1 5w

There are many ways of interacting with, taking care of and parenting children without having to legally own them

-3

Anonymous #5 5w

What’s this again

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

The anti adoption safe haven box thing. Just say you don’t care about infants and go girl

6

Anonymous OP 5w

that’s not what i’m asking. i’m asking if someone wants their own children but they can’t have children due to medical issues or what have you, what’s your solution? also you don’t “own” kids. kids are not property.

12

Anonymous #5 5w

Who girl? I don’t care about infants bc I don’t want them bought and sold like animals? Okay then

-3

Anonymous #5 5w

I KNEW IT WAS HER she comes back and does this every few months. i asked above and it confirmed it.

7

Anonymous OP 5w

I was adopted, does that mean I was bought like cattle? Say yes, I dare you.

3

Anonymous #1 5w

Kids don’t exist as a toy for you. No one is entitled to having one. And exactly kids aren’t property so why treat them as property parents are entitled to?

-4

Anonymous #1 5w

Knew I was who? Who is this mysterious person

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

homie it just sounds like you’re anti anyone having kids in general. 😭 you’re not making sense.

13

Anonymous #5 5w

Yes if it was thru the American private pro profit industry

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

knew you were the anti safe haven anti surrogacy person.

2

Anonymous #1 5w

huh, ofc im not. I’m literally against kids being used as dolls or property for rich ppl. Never said anything against having kids whatsoever

-4

Anonymous #1 5w

Who?

-2

The American private adoption industry treats all adoptees like that, it’s sickening

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

Girl shut the fuck up

11

Anonymous #5 5w

Girl are you okay?

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

Are you?

6

Anonymous OP 5w

kids aren’t property regardless. you keep pushing that narrative on to them 😭 if kids were property you’d have to pay property tax on them babes

4

Anonymous #5 5w

Are you?

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

Ofc I am, I have a loving family. Clearly you don’t

8

Anonymous #1 5w

Exactly…, that’s kinda. That’s kinda the whole point

-4

Anonymous #5 5w

Yikes

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

Someone should’ve adopted you from the parents that failed you

9

Anonymous OP 5w

and my point is that they aren’t property bc you don’t pay property taxes on kids… LMFAO LIKE

13

Anonymous #5 5w

Disgusting

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

That’s exactly my point girl what

-3

Anonymous OP 5w

hurts doesn’t it? don’t call her disgusting bc she’s giving you the same energy right back.

2

Anonymous OP 5w

nah ur switching up now

15

Anonymous #1 5w

Giving me the same energy for being anti human trafficking? Yikes

-3

Anonymous #1 5w

Switching up? I fear you missed the point from the beginning

-3

Anonymous OP 5w

There are def issues with the adoption industry and there are def issues of human trafficking but claiming all adoption = human trafficking is insulting to real trafficking victims. I hope you get the help you need girl

7

Anonymous OP 5w

how did we go from adoption to human trafficking

3

Anonymous OP 5w

you’re rage baiting anyway so i don’t give a fuck anymore

7

Anonymous #5 5w

Do you know who Georgia tann is? Have you done any research on the industry? You appear uniformed. And I’m good girl, but thanks for your concerns

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

Are you aware of the history at all?

-2

Rage bait? Sorry selling children like cattle is disgusting to me. Get well soon

-3

Anonymous OP 5w

all i care ab right now is my abortion that i have tmr and my oreos

4

Anonymous #1 5w

If you think it’s rage baiting to be against needlessly traumatizing children and families then I hope you get your morals aligned

-3

Anonymous OP 5w

I am. You appear uninformed though if you don’t know the nuance of the whole situation. And since you clearly don’t care about anything but bashing something what while does have issues, but also has saved lives, ima keep it there and say I hope both sides of your pillow are warm and hope you one day actually educate yourself and get the therapy you need. Have a horrendous night sweetheart.

2

Anonymous #1 5w

Oreos are good

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

i support adoption and also reforming the adoption/foster care system. thank you and goodbye.

10

Anonymous OP 5w

and so is abortion!! slay!!

11

Anonymous #5 5w

What do I seem uniformed on Who am I bashing?

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

Hell yeah, ofc

-4

Anonymous OP 5w

funny you can agree on abortion but not on adoptions. have the night you deserve (i hope it’s terrible).

10

Anonymous #1 5w

Why would I be anti choice?? You guys keep missing the point

-3

Anonymous #1 5w

And you hope it’s terrible bc I want families to stay together when possible and avoid needless trauma? I’ll sleep very well, thank you

-2

Anonymous OP 5w

i’m gonna piss you off with this one: some kids deserve to be separated from their families if it means they’ll have a better life. suck my dick. (derogatory).

7

Sure give me like 15 mins

-3

Anonymous #1 5w

Ofc children should not stay with unsafe caretakers, what gave you the impression I thought they should? The whole point is child centered care. Which is not what American private adoption is. Hence why I’m against it. It puts the adoptive parent first like when we ask questions like “well what are the ppl who want kids who can’t have them supposed to do” which is not the question we should ask. We should “what’s the safest care option possible for the child in question”

-3

Anonymous OP 5w

and sometimes the safest option is the child being with another family. you’re so fucking irritating and dense it’s insane 😭

20

The point is that Millie is not engaging in child centered care. She’s engaging in a for profit industry with roots in human trafficking to suit her needs of wanting to parent. That seeks out mothers in need (which usually involves coercing them into relinquishing rights) instead of what’s best for the baby, which is staying with their mother. Something like 98% of birth moms would keep their child if they had the funds. The birth parents need help not to have their child sold

-2

Ofc I would want them separated from unsafe homes?

-2

Anonymous #1 5w

Yeah I never said that wasn’t the safest option sometimes? Wdym dense, you’re still not getting it

-1

Anonymous OP 5w

okay so you do agree with adoption then, got it!!!

9

It doesn’t necessarily put them in a better position, just a different one. And the point of foster homes are family reunification, they’re not an alternative to adoption. And there aren’t as many checks after the adoption is finalized which is why many adoptees are subject to more abuse when compared to non adopted children

-3

Anonymous #1 5w

I only agree with adoption in America when they’re 18+ and can consent to it

-2

If it’s genuinely an unsafe home there are much better external care options than adopting out to strangers. In this case fictive kin legal guardianship would be the best option

-1

It’s not just adoption or homelessness. Those aren’t the only options. You’re leaving out a lot of external care options that are much more suited to different families

-2