Anonymous #4 48w

there was but her being a woman automatically makes the stereotype of her being a emotional period having woman who cant handle at what they call it a mans job and there are multiple sources and videos of ppl saying they didnt vote for her just because she is a female and emotional

55

Anonymous OP 48w

I agree!

11

Anonymous #12 48w

kamala and hilary are not the same

12

Anonymous #12 48w

Nah she was saying about how women are too emotional that’s why we didn’t vote Kamala and j was saying well look at Hilary

-2

Anonymous OP 48w

I meant you *

0

Anonymous #12 48w

Hilary wasn’t Kamala that’s for sure

2

Anonymous #12 48w

no white racists stick together aint no hate like white hate sorry to say it

4

Anonymous #7 48w

And I agree you right but I was talking about women in emotionality that is why America doesn’t want a woman in office

4

Anonymous #12 48w

america doesnt hate anyone like a woman and if she is of color its worse and we as a country know that and play off those stereotypes

9

12 ima hold your hand when i tell you this please read the sentences fully and slowly

6

Anonymous OP 48w

EXACTLY . I’m all for a woman being in office I don’t hate women ever but it starts with what they’ll do when elected

3

Anonymous #12 48w

are you a man…

2

Anonymous OP 48w

Woman dude omg and that’s exactly what I mean by emotions because you’re reacting straight off of that right now

1

Anonymous OP 48w

You just proved it ,

-1

Anonymous #12 48w

Idk but we have two man babies in office rn that’s all I know

3

Anonymous #12 48w

the way your speaking is sounding like your putting women in a category that you arent a part of thats why

7

Anonymous OP 48w

Men being so confused that women get understandably upset about being stereotype and try to justify their stereotype with that reaction will never cease to make me laugh

3

Anonymous OP 48w

If that’s what you took then kudos to you?

-3

Anonymous #7 48w

Killary sucks too!

-2

No, I’m saying we are not the only ones with nukes

-1

Anonymous #14 48w

They are all fucking zionest losers.

1

hes literally been told off by every single country that has visited him people elected him because they thought other countries would respect him… the entire world is laughing at him alongside the citizens of america

3

Marginally, yes. Based on the little bit of her handling of conflict we got to saw, I did not wish to take that risk.

-1

Anonymous #14 48w

and you would take the risk of trump being able to hold americas nuke, military and others when he is a weird, egotistical, felon… idk what your thought process is but it doesnt make sense

4

Very true. As I said, marginally. The primary motivator is that he appears to take the threat of the CCP seriously. He has put serious measures in place to improve our national security thus far, so that’s a plus at least. This is not something I believe Kamala would have changed our standing policy on, despite DHS recommendations

-1

Her uniformed and weak willed response in the onset of the Ukraine war was a serious concern. Her unwillingness to call out the CCP as it pertains to drug smuggling and espionage across our borders. Her going back and forth on how much she supported Israel. She did not have a strong enough stance on any foreign policies to be a convincing world leader.

1