Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
I know times are tough with AI, but Valve is acting like they're buying their parts straight from Best Buy, like did they forget they're a multi-billion dollar company, $1050 for 500 GB, and a ps5 level pc? Couldn't even add the controller in there šŸ˜‚
upvote 13 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

I mean I see ur argument, but markup on many of these components isn’t exactly high. Like sure they could get it a little cheaper if they buy the components in bulk from a supplier (plus they wouldn’t need to pay sales tax) but at the end of the day, companies like Nvidia and AMD want to make money too, and since gaming GPUs arent their big money makers, they already aren’t selling for much more than it costs to produce them.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

idk why people are complaining about the controller thing. you can buy it with or without one included because tons of people already have their controllers. what's the issue there?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 11h

Bruv, Valve isn’t Microsoft, Sony, Apple, or Nintendo. They don’t get to buy their parts at nearly the volume discounts these other companies can, nor can they take a loss assuming the buyer is required to stay in their ecosystem like an Xbox, PlayStation, or MacBook. If you want to install your own OS and pirate all your games, Valve can’t stop you.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

Plus, yes steam is a large company, but look who we’re comparing them to

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11h

The volume discount comparison is the real deal here. Valve plans to sell like what, a couple hundred thousand of these out the gate? They have no idea what demand is like. This isn’t like the literal millions of game consoles sold by the big players. The comparison to these other devices sold at a loss is so weak.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 7h

Yee the component companies have no guarantee that there’s even a market for this. They’re not gonna risk losing money to a unproven product. In the future prices will get better providing that valve proves the market exists

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

That logic makes no sense. Valve sold the Steam Deck at a loss, and it was a pc you could do whatever you want, which was a massive success for Valve. They also made a reservation waitlist for the controller and Machine, only selling to their audience making it harder for scalpers and non steam users to purchase

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

They sold the steam deck at a loss but they effectively have vendor-lock-in for that device, even if they don’t enforce it. Windows runs like shit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

That's just bad mismanagement if they're only producing so little. Steam Deck was a massive success, selling millions, and created the trend of pc handhelds. It's 4 yrs old and still selling out; you can't even buy one right now. Valve should know how influential they are and stop acting like their a small prebuilt company

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

Also ā€œat a lossā€ is relative, I think it was at a loss at the beginning, eventually achieving razor thin margins, with the latest price increase being effectively a profiting device in its own right, probably to cover for expected component cost increases.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

That's a lie it's not lock to steam os, you can switch to windows if you want to

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

They don't sell deck at a profit, they subsidize the cost like a console

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

I think we’re getting closer to agreeing when you say ā€œshould have produced moreā€ but I don’t think that’s fair to valve considering the insane competition for fabricator time among the AI chip boom. There’s only so much you can do, and getting this bent out of shape is pretty silly. We don’t have any idea how many were produced or shipped globally, this is all just a bunch of belly-aching over shit that’s outside of Valve’s control.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

If you really wanna be mad so badly, get mad at Sam Altman.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

Ok, I’m now convinced you’re a troll or a bullshitter. I said ā€œeffective lock-inā€. Most people don’t install windows. Most people leave it on SteamOS because that’s undoubtedly the best experience.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

They do sell the steam deck at a profit now, buddy, they’ve said as much.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 6h

If small prebuilt companies can sell PCs at the same price but provide better hardware, there's no point for the Steam Machine to exist. Is there even a big audience for a small form factor ?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

SmAlL pReBuIlT cOmPaNiEs have volume discounts on off the shelf components. This is a custom build, that valve is selling at-cost. Zero profit. There’s a Verge article about it. Go look it up.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

Are you an actual reddit Idiot? You said vendor lock-in, like how PS5 is locked into its own PS ecosystem. I'm simply saying the Steam Deck can work like the Steam Deck. At the end of the day their both PCs you can do whatever you want, but people will prefer the Steam os because it's the perfect gaming os

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

And your proving my point, steam machine can be subside without worrying people will switch OS

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

Nope stop lying though your teeth, show me evidence it is being sold at a profit

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6h

I said ā€œeffectiveā€ as a qualifier, bruv, admit that you misread me and the rest will make sense. We’re saying the same thing: SteamOS is the best experience so they don’t have to worry about putting Windows on the Steam Deck. They don’t have to lock the gate or even up walls in order to be sure we’ll all stay in the garden.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6h

You can’t even prove deck is being sold at a profit, just pulling info up your ahh

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5h

L mao bud. You fkn sank that low? Turns out there’s no evidence that Valve ever sold the deck at a loss, that’s just a rumor, but they have come out and said they sold the machine at cost. Either way, you’re a fucking idiot for thinking you can run their company better than them. I don’t envy your brain cells for how weak they must feel and how desperate they are to be used. I hope you suffer the way I have suffered having to refute your bullshit. Fuck off.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 5h

no hardware manufacturer intentionally sells any console or handheld PC at a loss. they haven't in like 20 years.

upvote 1 downvote