Anonymous #1 1d

Again I’ll say, imagine being this pressed 😬 you got some issues to work out oml

1

Anonymous OP 1d

But yea everyone from p1 w matt and Tommy to the f1 tv commentators are saying that Red Bull is no longer a top four car, doesn’t mean they’re objectively correct because it’s an opinion but you’re getting extremely frustrated over something that’s clearly debatable and been empirically supported

1

Anonymous OP 1d

If max and isack finished both of the races this year they would be ahead of mclaren rn in points. Isack is 8th which is top 4. I don’t know who you’re talking and don’t understand why they are relevant getting your opinion from other people especially podcasters is really weird. I haven’t heard the commentators directly say that but I don’t listen to the c list commentators so i wouldn’t know. Rather listen to it in spanish than f1 tv if i’m being real

3

Anonymous #1 1d

You might just be the braindead one if you’re saying to disregard multiple vcarb and rb retirements due to power unit issues in a conversation about the best cars on the grid 🥀 especially after emphasizing how the power unit is the same across the team and should be used as a performance metric lmaooo

1

Anonymous OP 1d

you don’t know how to read

1

Anonymous #1 1d

Both races weren’t finished because they retired the cars. They retired the cars because of power unit issues. Exactly why Haas has entered the conversation for fourth best car

1

Anonymous OP 1d

you fundamentally have no ability to process any information anyone says

5

Anonymous #1 1d

Would you prefer to focus on your “isack is 8th which is top 4” comment? Bc if you’d like to go by that logic we can look at the driver standings, in which max is 8th, as the 6th unique team…

1

Anonymous OP 1d

it hurt itself in its own confusion

1