Anonymous #1 2w

Yeah, I know Uncut Gems also didn’t have a crazy poster but that one was striking enough to work instead of “literally just a picture of Timothee Chalamet”

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Honestly I don’t think the shot itself is terrible the problem is that it’s so uninteresting, especially compared to the previous two Safdie flicks

1

Anonymous OP 2w

Not counting The Smashing Machine which also didn’t have a very interesting poster but at least in that one you could tell that the movie was going to involve some fighting

1

Anonymous OP 2w

for me the issue with the composition is how it makes his proportions look wonky at a distance, like the way his body is framed gives the illusion of his upper arms being disproportionately massive and his torso being twig-like. just awkward visual language imo

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Okay now I see what you mean, yeah that does look kinda wonky

3

Anonymous OP 2w

my only familiarity with the Safdies though is The Curse so I’m not really looking at the poster through the lens of what their filmography is like

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Their movies tend to be comedies of errors that are very tense, I’ve only ever watched Uncut Gems but that movie had me on the edge of my seat it was so good

1

Anonymous OP 2w

ugh see that kind of thing is So hit-and-miss for me that it tends to either become my new favorite or leave me genuinely pissed lmao, and I got the impression Uncut Gems would likely be the latter so I skipped it. makes sense though that those guys would work so well with Nathan Fielder if that’s their niche, The Curse was fuckin killer

1

Anonymous OP 2w

(tbh Nathan Fielder used to really rub me the wrong way too but I warmed up to him after watching that and The Rehearsal)

1

Anonymous #2 2w

Yeah fair Uncut Gems is definitely one of those love it or hate it movies, can’t comment on Marty Supreme or Good Time though

1

Anonymous #2 2w

thank you 😊

1