Anonymous #2 16h

Facts

-10

Anonymous #6 16h

Real. People be downvoting for no reason. If I was 14 dating an 18 yr old. I’d be a damn school legend

-8

Anonymous #2 15h

And that’s part of the problem, isn’t it. Guys don’t realize the lasting psychological harm it’s causing them because all of society tells them they should be proud of it

32

Anonymous #7 15h

Shit I’ve only dated older girls until my recent gf. I’ve been vibing

-8

Anonymous #2 14h

Fr twin up he don’t even know

7

Anonymous #7 13h

Or it’s not causing harm and yall just throwing the word rape around.

-2

Anonymous #2 12h

A child cannot consent. Romeo and Juliet laws for a 17 year old and 18 year old so they don’t get imprisoned. A 14 year old is a child. A child cannot consent, it’s statutory rape.

12

Anonymous #5 12h

Romeo and Juliet is for that reason and reason alone bruh. I ain’t into kids. But it’s 4 years no matter what way. 18 is legal adult yes. But as long as it is 4 years and there is consent it’s legally ok. Morally? No. But it legally is

-1

Anonymous #2 11h

Twin. A child cannot consent to sex. That’s the point I’m trying to make here. And 18 year old is an adult with a minor. Making it statutory rape. It is both morally and legally wrong

8

Anonymous #5 11h

Bro it’s litterly what the law was made for. Go read the book. Otherwise what is it for? 18+? Obviously not

-2

Anonymous #2 11h

I don’t know how to make this clear. An 18 year old in a Romantic and sexual relationship with a 14 year old is statutory rape. That is by legality, an adult with a minor.

6

Anonymous #5 11h

So what’s the difference with 16 and 20? Nothing. It is legal not moral. No rape as long as it’s consent. Look at the fucking law books man

-3

Anonymous #2 11h

It’s not legal. Again, that is an adult in a sexual relationship with a minor. That is statutory rape. The books say that.

7

Anonymous #5 11h

It literally doesn’t. I had a buddy freshman year dating an 18 year old. Going strong to this day. Half the weird girls at 16 were fuckin 20 yr olds. You are actually just so wrong

-3

Anonymous #5 11h

As long as it’s 4 years and consent is given. It’s not rape Actually just dumb asf

-2

Anonymous #2 11h

mentioning how normalized sick relationships are in our society doesn’t make you sound any better

13

Anonymous #2 11h

Those were children taken advantage of. Your buddy was groomed. Those 16 year old children were taken advantage of. They are children. They were children. They cannot consent. There is no amount of minimal age gap that will make it okay.

8

Anonymous #2 11h

Read it 5

-1

Anonymous #2 11h

5 you real quiet now

2

Anonymous #5 10h

Look at the flick bruv

-2

Anonymous #2 10h

The law holds space for discretion. Any bench trial, any jury, a just one, would agree that a 14 year old is a child who cannot consent. If you think that this is moral because there is a mere by-law in some events that I do not even think should be up for discretion, then this conversation is a failure to have.

6

Anonymous #5 10h

Bruh. I said it wasn’t moral. I just wanted to prove to dumbass wrong

-2

Anonymous #5 10h

A 14 year old would not be tried as an adult for stealing. They would not be housed with adults in a penitentiary. Because fundamentally they are a child. The discretion of difference of age is up to the state, and even then, do you hear yourself? This is the hill you want to die on? That it is okay, in any world for a child to be groomed and coerced?

9

Anonymous #2 10h

You started this with saying “you a baller fr” for someone saying they may have been raped. You are justifying it. Don’t back out now

10

Anonymous #5 10h

Aye bruh. You said it was illegal. I proved you wrong. No. It is not moral. No it is not right. But it’s the law. People can do whatever they want man. I would never do it. You obviously wouldn’t. The argument wasn’t about morality of the situation. It was about legality

-1

Anonymous #2 10h

The legality in of itself is up to state discretion. That is the point. While there is no blanket law of minimum guidance, the point remains that it is an adult in a sexual relationship with a minor. That is by definition statutory rape. While state discretion may change, federal guidelines are straightword on the wording of the actors in the matter.

7

Anonymous #5 10h

Yes. But states do allow what happened in this guys scenario. Just depends where said people are from whether it is or isn’t illegal. In my state if what happened in the post was consensual from both parties then it’s legally ok.

-1

Anonymous #2 10h

If he’s doubting if he’s been raped, that implies that there was dubious consent. That’s blood in the water

5

Anonymous #5 10h

Well ig we will never know for sure

-1