Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD RENEE NICOLE GOOD
upvote 912 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Wheels clearly pointing away from any officer. Do not let anyone justify her murder

post
upvote 181 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

she had a name, she had a story, she had an entire life before ICE agents took that away from her in cold blood. The least we can do to honor her memory is remember her name. Don’t let them dehumanize her further. she deserved to live

upvote 121 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

this is her on the right btw, not the women on the left (that picture has wrongfully circulated) RIP Renee.

post
upvote 110 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

This is the bullet hole though, which means he would’ve had to been to the side of the car to shoot

post
upvote 12 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

How is this a confession?

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w
post
upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

In this position, he could’ve easily moved out of the way yet he didn’t

post
upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

Don’t forget her name. Because you will like everyone else besides George Floyd.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w

who

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 4w
post
upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Watch the whole video, she clearly tried to run him over. Don’t just follow everyone you see online. Do your own research

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

The ice agent should have been trained properly, why didn’t he block her in first like police are trained to. And use his taser not a lethal. She shouldn’t have tried peeling away but come on that’s natural instinct when a gun is pointed at you with hooded figures. No politics has anything to do with this.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 5w

Hit him where. Are you just really dumb, hard of seeing, Trump dick rider, like what’s going on?

post
upvote 99 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5w

I would say thats the wrong argument. The car definitely taps him. But that’s because the ice agent purposefully moved to the right, knowing she was trying to leave, leaned into the car when he could have moved, and shot three times after he wasn’t not even in any danger. There was no need to shoot the woman. Imo it is clearly murder and it’s unjustified. This was not self defense.

upvote 82 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5w

And don’t just follow the lies your daddy tweets, you moron

upvote 23 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 5w

He was standing in front of her vehicle, blocking her, and she proceed to try and drive him over

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5w

I use my own eyes, and my own common sense see has really happened. Why you getting disrespectful if I’m not disrespecting you

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5w

Exactly why the ice agent should have stopped his car infront of the car blocking it. It’s very unclear in the video her actual intent of “peeling out” she did accelerate very fast which makes it seem like she tried to run him over. Still I think both parties are in the wrong. He should have had his taser out not a gun unless he had a reason to but 🤷‍♂️

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5w

Haha 6 replied to 7

upvote -5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 5w

With that being said if hooded figures came up to me in my car too I’d try to accelerate away too. It Doesn’t matter where the wheel was pointed it happened so quickly. The car peeled out and then she turned away. She was definitely scared. A US CITIZEN TOO not even someone they are suppse to be looking for.

upvote 16 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 5w

Dawg I literally just found a clip of her running into some dude

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5w

Like I don’t like ice either but you can’t expect to end up unscathed if you run your car into someone pointing a gun at you telling you to get out. If you have a death wish and want to try to disarm them, you legitimately have a better chance walking up to them like instructed and trying to use your hands. Not that that’s a good idea either but like, common sense lol don’t drive your car at someone pointing a gun at you

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5w

Especially law enforcement. A vehicle is considered a deadly weapon, so if you drive your vehicle at someone, well…

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 5w

To add context to this, anyone trained will tell you that the reason you don’t hold a gun directly to someone’s head is because it’s easier for them to dodge and try to take it from you, so that’s what I mean when I say you stand a better chance the closer you are. If you’re just staring down the barrel that’s in front of your windshield, and you drive towards that barrel… good luck I guess

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

I mean yeah… if you jump to the side to avoid getting hit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Front windshield and would’ve had to have been to the side? Did you even see the clip of the guy who shot? He was in front of the car and the car was actively being turned towards him, so that’s why the angle is like that

upvote -7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 4w

Then he still broke the law. It is illegal to shoot at someone while they are trying to flee if he was to the side, then he should’ve put down his gun.

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 4w

Nobody was hooded tho, not even a mask

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

There’s LITERALLY a clip you could’ve watched before posting this dawg

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

So I did watch the full video and when I mean full, I mean full, including her getting cut off by another car as they’re trying to move their vehicles out of the way for the ice agents. But if you look at the bullet hole, it fractures more to the left this implies that it was shot from the left. It doesn’t matter that it’s at the front of the car. The only way to get that shot is to be from the side of the vehicle.

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

If you watched the full video where the shot was fired, why are you pretending like he was standing to the side? The front corner of the hood of her care makes contact with him big dawg, that’s why it’s from that angle

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

So either you’re lying or you need to go rewatch it

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

And no, it’s not illegal. All law enforcement agencies classify vehicles as a deadly weapon and are trained to shoot if someone starts driving at them with one. You’re gonna take this as me saying it’s good she was shot, but I agree it wasn’t. I’m just saying that from a legal standpoint, you’re wrong since you brought it up

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Also I’m pretty sure anyone with a gun would shoot at a vehicle driving at them, law enforcement or not. Simply not a smart decision on her part

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Like me personally if there’s a dude with armor and a gun yelling at me to get out of the car, I’m not driving straight at them to make it an easier shot, especially if my whole vehicle is surrounded. That’s legitimately just asking to get shot at that point

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

And me personally if I’m the dude with armor and the gun, I’m also probably shooting if I get charged by a vehicle. You would too if you were in their shoes. You can lie and say you wouldn’t, but you would

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I want you to know that first of all I’m not trying to be mean at all when I say this, but I have watched the video I would say about 30 times to ensure that what happened actually happened and I’ve also been trained to shoot guns before so I know how impact works on them. With his height compared to the car unless he was the worst shot ever he would’ve more than likely not been able to get this angle if he was in front of it when he shot. He would’ve had to be to the side of the left front

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Idk what video you’ve seen but the hood of her care makes contact with him right as he shoots, so you try to sound smart all you want but idk how you trained to shoot guns if your eyes are really that bad to not have seen it

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

It would borderline be impossible for the bullet hole to be like that. And like I told someone else, even if she tried to hit him with her car, which she did not even if his leg got clipped, he was actively moving in front of a car that was moving. It is not only against the law but his job to not shoot a fleeing vehicle or a person. It does not matter if she did try to ram him he killed her illegally.

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

No, I wouldn’t cause it’s my job as an enforcer to follow the law

upvote 13 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

It is terrifying that if you were in this position, you would kill someone when you could’ve shot the tire or let them go

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Here you go man

post
upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I can understand if you didn’t see the angle or the guy at first since it’s blurry, so I won’t be mean either but like cmon bruh it’s kinda obvious

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

His gun is damn near pressed into the windshield as the car is touching him, and there’s nobody behind or to the side of him whose shot would’ve hit the front windshield

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

???? Have you never read incident reports or a legal analysis of situations like these before? If a car is trying to ram them, they are allowed to shoot

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

No, he’s still in the wrong. He still shot a legal citizen while on duty. He’s not allowed to do that. If he had enough time to pull out a gun he had enough time to get out of the way which he did not do.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

If you use deadly force against law enforcement (ie, A CAR), they can use deadly force back

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

No, not correct it doesn’t matter if a car is actively fleeing. They are not allowed to shoot.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

As if the other people cops shoot while on duty aren’t legal citizens either 🤦‍♂️ yeah no shit she was a legal citizen. Doesn’t matter if it’s a citizen or not, if you attempt to ram someone with your car, you’re getting shot dawg

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

His gun was out well before she charged at him

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Do I seriously have to pull up legal code to prove you wrong, or can you look that up yourself?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

There is a massive difference between fleeing and driving directly at someone. If you watch the clip (which I’m starting to doubt you did), he genuinely attempted to move to the side, but she turned TOWARD him, not away through the gap he was trying to leave

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

My goodness, please tell me you are not a police officer/ice or have access to a gun because you clearly do not know the laws. Not only am I an economics major, which means I study political motivated stuff like this, but also I studied law for a while. if you believe that he genuinely was in the right you were being persuaded incorrectly

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Nope, with that gunshot, he shot her while he was no longer in eminent danger

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Economics major Jesus Christ I have family who are lawyers and police officers and I have inquired about this to them already. You must not have studied enough because you’re wrong

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I actually don’t believe you on that one. Sadly they might be lawyers and police officers, but I don’t think you inquiry about it because to do so so you would have to genuinely look at the whole video.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

So if someone purposefully rams into your body with a car while you attempt to get out of the way, you GENUINELY think he is not allowed to shoot?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

I don’t believe anything you’ve said so far so I guess we’re both in the same boat. Maybe the economic major part is true though, I’ll give you that one lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

You know what I just got a photo of it and I hate to say this, but you are wrong. I usually don’t wanna say it like that but someone did a complete zoom in on it and you are incorrect on this one and yes, I do think you should genuinely not be allowed to shoot when it’s your job to not shoot.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

I already sent you a photo, here it is again

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Notice how he is actively being hit by the car

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I even drew you a big red arrow

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Send the photo you have since I sent you one

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I can even get a zoomed in clip if you need it to watch someone getting hit by a car

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I just put my photo in the comments, but it didn’t add onto the link. Sorry about that.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Do you want to see the motion he was taking, or are you going to ignore that factor? He *was* moving out of the way, the car turns into *him*, not the other way around

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

The reason his leg is on that side of the car at the instant that photo was taken is because he had already been hit and pushed the rest of the way over to that side

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

All good it did the same thing to me too the first time, don’t worry about it

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

So I don’t think you understand and after this last comment, I’m gonna end the conversation I don’t care if you need to have the last word or not I don’t give a fuck. He had the ability to move out of the way he shot once from the side left of the car and then he shot twice more in the open driver side window. He murdered her. It doesn’t matter what she did because he still pulled the trigger three times

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

How do I send a video? I have the clip cropped down to where he was actively trying to move out of the way that shows his direction of motion. Also why does the amount of times he pulled the trigger matter? Like I said earlier, Mr law studying economic major, the law classifies a car as use of deadly force, so they are legally authorized to use deadly force back even if the car is moving slowly

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

That’s fine I don’t really care about the last word, but I want to send the video since I genuinely don’t think you’ve seen it from the angle that proves he was moving out of the way

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Also for reference, the first shot was fired as her left headlight made contact with him, so “left side of the car” is kinda stretching the fact that he was at the front left corner, which is why the bullet hole looks like it was shot from, you guessed it, the front left corner or someone right on the hood

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

I’m gonna be so honest when I say this, I’ve seen every angle, I’ve seen the full clip. I’ve seen the videos of the ice agents knocking over memorials for her. I’ve seen the vice president’s speech about how she was trying to kill him. I’ve seen the president’s Twitter post. I’ve seen the video of people begging to help her and check to see if she was alive.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

That’s fine and all, good for you. I’m not saying ICE is good or celebrating that she got shot. You brought up the legal aspect. I’m telling you the legality

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

I saw as she was originally going to leave another car went in front of her, and then the ice vehicle pulled up and it looked most likely like it was trying to go ahead so she tried to let it, and when she tried to let it they got out of the vehicle and surrounded her, which is when she tried to leave and that man walked in front of her vehicle as she was trying to leave mind you she backed up first and turned. Like you said he approached with his gun out which goes against policy

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Look since you say you study law, I’ll go ahead and let YOU have the last say since you want it so badly and refuse to let me send you a video or acknowledge the picture I already sent that proves your entire argument wrong. All I have to say is you should’ve studied harder

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

Not only was he not supposed to have his gun out to begin with but the fact that he did says that he is triggered happy, and if you look at the full video, she is trying to leave peacefully when they approached her in a violent matter, put their hands in the window and when she tried to leave, he shot her dead. She tried to leave, which means this man illegally shot her.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #9 4w

Dude, I’ve seen the video. I acknowledge the picture that you sent me, but I also acknowledge that I saw the video and I know how it happened. You clearly haven’t though. Because if you did watch it all like I did, you would see clearly what happened maybe instead of insulting someone you should do your own research watch the full video not the just the bit where she gets shot

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

You’re a scholar. In fact, you’re like the fastest competitor in the special Olympics.

upvote -8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #17 4w

You have no idea what you’re talking about. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #18 4w

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8fdS6Rm/

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #18 4w

That’s the video itself no cuts no add-ins plain simple proof don’t be an asshole. Use your brain.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 4w

Please stop embarrassing yourself. Unless you know anything about a use of force, continuum, I would advise you to quit while you’re ahead.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #18 4w

Maybe she should of just got out the car Ike she was asked to do, instead of running people over.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #22 4w

You’re an absolute fucking idiot because that isn’t her but nice looking white girl ig

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 4w

What is your knowledge of law enforcement tactics, and use of force to form such an opinion?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #18 4w

dude go smoke a blunt or some shit

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 4w

No thanks, and you just proved my point!

upvote 0 downvote