
I think you got your reply threads confused. this post is about covid and “touch grass”, the “chronically” thing was my previous post. either way, your example pretty clearly reinforces my point that “chronically” is a word that is near-exclusively used in reference to disabled people
I’m well aware of the word’s definition, thanks. what I don’t understand is why you’re going out of your way to pretend that language exists in a vacuum, where a word never develops associations with other words and concepts based on the context in which it’s most frequently used. part of “language languaging” is connotations & proximity
if you’re still having trouble comprehending my point and you genuinely aren’t just playing obtuse as an attempt at dismissing my point, I would suggest that you try taking some classes which could provide you with an overview of subjects like linguistics and close-reading beyond the “101” level