Anonymous #2 1w

No

18

Anonymous #2 1w

terrorism does

19

Anonymous #7 1w

Tough for someone to say anonymously right?

-8

Anonymous #7 1w

Demons*

20

Anonymous #5 1w

Simply just calling someone racist for questioning how a system isn’t racism, it’s just an uncomfortable conversation ignorant people aren’t ready for, Charlie simply supported hiring the most qualified candidates not just filling in a quota, you can call it racist all you want but you can’t say he didn’t make a good point when arguing it, those conversations are important to have, screaming racist doesn’t doesn’t do anything

18

Anonymous #3 1w

affirmative action is a response to systemic racism. being against affirmative action is racism and ignorance.

66

Anonymous #2 1w

and so does being a neo nazi. but he wasn’t killed for that reason, he was killed for being too left

5

Anonymous #5 1w

no it’s not. that’s how you end up with morons in positions they never should have been in the first place simply to satisfy a quota. how about just be more qualified for the job?

-4

Anonymous #12 1w

No the “context” is that he went on to say he thinks sympathy is a much better word than empathy and he explains why. Why is this part of the quote cut off to intentionally mislead people?

19

Anonymous #12 1w

You’re completely wrong he never said that

1

Anonymous #13 1w

He hates empathy and thinks gun violence is acceptable so hobbyists can keep their surplus of firearms.

9

Anonymous #6 1w

No you are completely misconstruing what he said. Did you even watch the debate? He is saying the word empathy has lost its meaning and has been weaponized, he doesn’t hate empathy

-5

Anonymous #13 1w

No, he said it’s a “made up, new-age term” that supposedly does damage. Because he was a hateful piece of shit.

23

Anonymous #5 1w

The direct argument against this is for Indian and Asian doctors who are highly successful in America because they are hard working and QUALIFIED. Affirmative Action is good on paper but doesn't work in practice because it's always going to be better to hire the more qualified person. Which is why Education should be free or vastly cheaper so everyone can have the same opportunity at achieving it.

6

Anonymous #12 1w

He even said himself that if he was killed he wouldn't mind if it meant keeping 2A lol. So ignorant

1

Anonymous #11 1w

He said empathy was a made up new age term than does a lot of damage because it’s not possible to put yourself in another’s shoes. Then said compassion and sympathy are good because they lead to understanding and action. The problem is that logic is a lie. You CAN put yourself in someone else’s shoes as a way to understand their emotions and ACT to help them. He’s calling the catalyst for what he wants damaging while supporting a weaker form that does NOT have the effect he’s claiming to want.

10

Anonymous OP 1w

Then stop promoting murder

0

Anonymous #16 1w

You are all blatantly mischaracterizing his argument

2

Anonymous #13 1w

Please explain what about the argument above was a blatant mischaracterization

6

Anonymous #17 1w

He said black women have lower brain processing power than white men… you can claim that talking about affirmative action is “context” but it’s literally blatant racism and the context is subtle racism

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Facts arent racist. Just because you dont like it doesnt mean its racist

-2

Anonymous #13 1w

And the facts are that 1. Systemic racism still exists. 2. The systemic racism of America’s past still affects black people today. 3. Affirmative action attempts to help those who are disenfranchised. And most importantly 4. Black women have the same mental ability as all other groups. Piss off

7

Anonymous OP 1w

If you actually watch the clip youre talking about, hes not saying all black women dont have the brain processing power, he was talking about 4 specific individuals, which all happened to be black. The quote is blatantly false and makes him out to be something he isnt

-2

Anonymous #3 1w

And he said they lack brainpower, which is somehow justified because he said something you agree with?

11

Anonymous #13 1w

Ok he wasn’t talking about all black women, just the ones he interacted with? That’s still racist. If you meet a black person and your FIRST assumption is that they got the job because of affirmative action AND INSULT THEIR BRAIN POWER, that’s racist

5

Anonymous OP 1w

That’s not what he said at all. Do yourself a favor and watch the clip, it’ll clear it up for you a bit. He’s obviously interacted with far more than just 4 black women, he was saying that these 4 specific black women, (who admitted they are only in their positions because of affirmative action) were stupid basically. It had nothing to do with the color of their skin. He wasnt assuming they got the job because of AA, they literally admitted it themselves publicly.

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Once again I encourage you to just watch the full discussion on your own, because if you did then you wouldn’t be misunderstanding the situation so severely

0

Anonymous #2 1w

I did watch it. The conversation started as a conversation about affirmative action, but then became about all black people. A random black pilot. A random black woman at a desk job. All that context does is establish what argument he makes when defending or supporting racism.

7

She’s defending better representation because there is a large gender and racial gap for a lot of different fields. Affirmative action is NOT about picking unqualified people. It’s about looking at those who are qualified, but are often overlooked for positions because of historical bias and systemic racism. Eat my ass

1

You’re racist

1

I’m not tho. You’ve not responded to anything I’ve said. The only thing you’ve said it “no that’s what he meant” over and over again. You’re in a cult and you’ll deny it in a decade. But I’ll remembers pepperage farm remembers

1

She didn’t say that about herself. Wanting or accepting help from affirmative action doesn’t mean she’s calling herself stupid. That’s the disconnect. Accepting help doesn’t make you inherently worse or weaker than someone who doesn’t need help. Kirk mourners are racist.

9

So the people disenfranchised by our government and society don’t need or deserve any help to achieve a semblance of equality? If no then, you believe that one race deserves a leg up on the other (you think white people deserved to be an upper class over blacks), which would then make you the racist. Try again

18

It’s not solely based off of race. Ever. It’s a fucking factor. Systemic racism still exist even if the civil rights act passed in the 60’s. Fun fact, Kirk hated the civil rights acts of the 60’s. So you’re saying we needed afirmative action in the 60’s, but not now, while defending the guy who thinks we never needed the civil rights act in the first place? You’re doing a racism dance. Find god. Try again. Take a lap

9

Slavery never left and we still have Jim Crow segregational mindsets in a lot of aspects of society. It’s fucked up. This is not just an issue of the past— this is an issue of we-need-to-fucking-fix-it-now-and-forever.

8