Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
The whole eugenics argument has a also silly because you aren't genetically poor and you're actually more likely to stop being poor if you don't have a kid while you're young and poor which is better for both you and your future kid
If you can’t afford transportation, food, clothing, or basic necessities for yourself, DO NOT HAVE KIDS. If you cannot afford anything without taxes, DO NOT HAVE KIDS. It’s not that child’s burden to carry nor is it their fault that you are poor.
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

You know history is clear that eugenics is a crackpot theory. Ibn Battuta traveled earlier and further than Marco Polo and he observed the society and the peoples. He deduced any noble family bloodline goes extinct within 150 years. Frederick Nietzsche is argued to be friendly to eugenics but he did say that the aristocracy damages their generics and goes extinct and a distant cousin that is poor fills the void to be the new aristocracy.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 3w

Notice the people who pay and advocate for eugenics, they come from families who at one point were basically inbred. As they gain more wealth, such practices come back because the biggest conspiracy against them are in-laws that will take their estates. Eugenics for the poor but not for them.

upvote 1 downvote