Anonymous #1 16h

its THE WHITE HOUSE. and did u miss the part where they had their credentials confiscated??? that’s literally a violation of the first amendment right to free speech/press

8

Anonymous #2 16h

It’s literally not. You really need to educate yourself. That’s embarrassing.

-2

Anonymous #2 16h

The credentials part is stupid but it’s doesn’t matter if it’s the White House. There are millions of places in the country where you can’t record. The White House is now one of them. It’s only unconstitutional if it’s public property

2

Anonymous #3 16h

I know ur on my side but the way you responded is ridiculous. Don’t talk to ppl like that

0

Anonymous #3 16h

even experts say that it is a violation of the first amendment so who are you to say that it’s not lmao also i am educated thanks for your concern

4

Anonymous #1 16h

no it’s a violation of the constitution because he’s taking it away based on their reporting. it doesn’t matter WHERE. he’s taking away their right to free speech and press

3

Anonymous #2 16h

They can still report on whatever they want. They just can’t do it on federal property

0

Anonymous #1 15h

oh yeah man, restricting reporters from federal proceedings (only the ones who say things about you that you don’t like, which are usually true and very good for the public to hear btw) is totally constitutional because it’s a house. (not his house btw. belongs to the american public.) This is not a company saying they don’t want reporters, this is the AMERICAN GOVERNMENT RESTRICTING FREE PRESS AND FREE SPEECH. literally word for word a first amendment violation.

1

Anonymous OP 15h

and even if it wasn’t first amendment violation (which it very much is), it is still incredibly concerning??? why would you defend blocking reporters from reporting on executive decisions that affect ALL OF US???

1