Anonymous #11 41w

A good looking girl, not a supermodel or anything, can go to a random guy and chat with him and if she says “want to come back to my place for some fun?” I guarantee you 90% minimum would be down for that.

33

Anonymous #13 41w

Yes exactly, so if the word applies to almost every one of them then it wasn’t created or used for them. It is like calling red paint reddish. Red paint is red, it is not redish. Redish is to describe something that is not red and has something red tinging it. Easy is used to refer to women who are easy to sleep with because women are typically difficult to sleep with. It makes no sense to call a man easy because all men would sleep with a woman easily. Words serve to separate and identify.

12

Comment Deleted

0

Anonymous #18 41w

Welcome to confessions where the same 10 posts are recycled and upvoted. Why though? Who knows, can’t even sell an account like Reddit or Twitter so makes no sense

49

That’s funny, then who is fucking the women ? Themselves? In that case yeah I agree

1

Anonymous #13 41w

attention seeking mfs (PS: you’re a dipshit if you upvote ts )

8

Anonymous #14 41w

🗣️🗣️

1

Anonymous #23 41w

and a pencil that’s been in a bunch of sharpeners is small and useless

8

Anonymous #23 41w

Well then it’s a damn good thing that women aren’t locks and men aren’t keys hope this helps ☺️

9

Anonymous #20 41w

the point is to make it symmetrical to show how dumb the expectation is

0

Anonymous #28 41w

It makes no sense to remove something from its context and replace it with something else in order to claim a logical inconsistency when the thing you are removing is the very thing that defines the context

3

Anonymous #11 41w

the point is that the context is arbitrary and untrue, so it does make sense to remove it from the context.

0

Anonymous #28 41w

Right but you can’t do that without switching the other side. Otherwise, yes it seems dumb but now you can’t compare it to the expectation for women because they don’t have the other expectations for men ascribed to them

0

Anonymous #28 41w

The context is sex and our association with it. I think that being a man or a woman is incredibly relevant in this. Also how could such a large common cultural consensus on something this big possibly develop to begin with if it was completely arbitrary

0

Anonymous #20 41w

the goal in doing so is to point out the wrongness of those expectations. it’s not to shame men but to make a scenario where the roles are switched to portray the idiocy of those expectations. we’re on the same side dawg

1

Anonymous #11 41w

there’s a common consensus in multiple countries that it’s ok to do terrible things. societal acceptance is not morality, and if you genuinely believe it is then we’re done here.

1

Anonymous #28 41w

So in order for a cultural consensus on something to develop it had to have survived right? This means it had to have some sort of purpose. In india they developed the no eating cows cultural custom because it was helped them heavily with their system of agriculture. In order for a cultural custom to survive and last it had to have served some benefit. In this case women are stigmatized for sex more because they had to carry the burden of pregnancy so it was a bigger deal. This meant that throu

0

Anonymous #11 41w

slavery used to be a cultural consensus 😐

1