Anonymous #6 1d

Murder implies the killing is unlawful. I don’t think the balance of nature is unlawful

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

“balance of nature” “nature intended”😂. do you have any evidence that this goes against nature? any at all?

4

Anonymous #6 1d

Well it is true that species that have the matriarchs to do the selective breeding like Lions and Elephants have a better communal balance, social harmony and strong genetic offspring. And because women weren’t allowed to choose who they reproduced with for majority of human history we are damned with an overpopulation of incompetent men. To solve this issue we get rid of all the incompetent men which I assume to actually be 85% (75% is too generous) and let nature run its course.

5

Anonymous #6 1d

Sounds like some Netanyahu shit

2

Anonymous OP 1d

Need less women with that logic

6

Anonymous OP 1d

🇮🇱🇮🇱

5

Anonymous #2 1d

Btw you’d be part of the 75% no hard feelingsssss

1

Anonymous OP 1d

ok and what are your standards for “incompetent” oh societal genius? are we gonna start killing people based on test scores now?

11

Anonymous OP 1d

Well I’d be okay with that if that means you’re gone too. You sound like a plague

1

Anonymous #6 1d

Well with how painful idiotic a lot you guys are all I’d need is a 3 minute conversation theoretically.

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

you didn’t answer my question. what are your standards for incompetent?

8

Anonymous OP 1d

and a 3 minute convo is all you need to decide whether someone deserves to die or not? really?

10

Anonymous #2 1d

Girly why are you so upset this is for the betterment of humanity

0

Anonymous #6 1d

Hey, most of you guys kill a girl after she says no, so I mean I think it’s pretty fair

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

I’m not. I’m just saying there needs to be less of u. You sound like an awful person

6

Anonymous OP 1d

Look if you want to live all you have to do is submit to the matriarchy and be a good boy.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

you’re not answering my question.

11

Anonymous OP 1d

Example #50

4

Anonymous #6 1d

So sorry what was the question

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

Yeah yeah blah blah talk to your therapist about it

0

Anonymous #6 1d

She Can’t even read and talking incompetence

6

Anonymous OP 1d

I literally said it multiple times but I’ll say it again. What are your standards for “incompetent”.

14

Anonymous OP 1d

lol okay

1

Anonymous #6 1d

Okay I’ll quite trolling. My main issue with the patriarchal systems right now is the constant need for power and the lack of emotional intelligence that comes with it. Emotional intelligence and empathy is a key factor when it comes to competence, personhood and a functional society which is why everything is a mess. Do I think these traits are irredeemable, no cause I’m not a fucking bio essentialist. However I do think getting rid of 3 billion yall will indeed get us where we need to be.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

ok and what about women who lack empathy and emotional intelligence? like female republicans pushing against civil rights and environmental stuff? are you gonna kill them too? it’s not just bad men messing up the world, it’s bad people. you see how many holes can be poked in your argument?

8

Anonymous OP 1d

And in a timely manner. And before you say that it is illogical for me to call for the killing of 40% of our population I’ll say this. 3 billion die today, little to no meaningless deaths for centuries going on millenniums. And the human race avoids extinction. And yes men will be the reason why we go extinct if we continue on the way we are.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

dude again what about women who lack empathy and emotional intelligence? it’s bad people messing up the world, not just bad men. like the female republicans pushing against civil rights and environmental protection, or the anti feminists who use their social media platforms to say women should stay in the home. they have a problematic impact in society too. are you gonna kill them too?

8

Anonymous #6 1d

Oh don’t be silly I know there are bad women out there and if it makes you feel better we’ll kill them too (no we won’t). It’s so incredibly nice you brought that up because again, not only do un-empathetic men seriously out ratio un-empathetic women. We’re talking 9:1 here. I also think that the man was actually created by an evil woman so I’ll acknowledge your point. But you’re still gonna be part of that 75% my guy.

0

Anonymous OP 1d

for what? disagreeing with you? and how about some more points. even the worst people have humanity in them. what if a dude has anti feminist beliefs, but he’s a dad who loves his children? are you gonna kill him and leave his kids without a dad? what about the dude with anti feminist beliefs who runs a dog shelter? you gonna kill him and leave the dogs without someone to care for them? what about the 12 year old who’s being manipulated by red pill podcasters? you gonna kill a child?

7

Anonymous #6 1d

yes, being anti feminist is absolutely terrible, but it doesn’t mean someone deserves to die. and also, you say killing un-empathetic men will make the world better, but you won’t kill un-empathetic women? despite the fact that by your logic this would cleanse the population of terrible people? you’re a hypocrite.

8

Anonymous #6 1d

Heeeyyy now now now there will be no children killing okay I am not a monster. But yeah I agree even the worst people to ever exist have some good traits like Hitler he was an artist and an animal lover. But again my concern is not about whether a misogynist likes dogs, my concern is the longevity of the human race. Most if not all women who have there morals in a ditch are pandering to patriarchal ideologies and yes I do believe women play a part in these systems in the modern day an age.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

Killing them wouldn’t make sense because the only people who benefit from the patriarchy are men. They’d have no reason to pander to anything and they’d loose nothing of value.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

well, there would actually be children killing given that you advocated for killing 75-85 percent of the male population, and males under 18 make up around 30 percent of the male population worldwide. so even if you lowball it and decide to go for 75 percent, 5 percent of those you killed would be children.

6

Anonymous OP 1d

Look you’re not gonna die unless you mistakenly vote me for president in 18 years. This was just a hypothetical.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

okay and? what about abusive mothers? or abusive girlfriends? what about female white supremacists? what about female pedos? are you gonna excuse those because of “patriarchy?”

8

Anonymous OP 1d

And the patriarchy harms men too. Homophobia toward gay/bi men, and the abuse and discrimination many have to face because of that, stems directly from it. Men’s mental heath isn’t taken seriously, since men are supposed to not feel cry or be depressed: they just have to “man up”. Men who are abused by women are harmed by the patriarchy, since said patriarchy doesn’t generally view women as abusers. (Continued in next comment).

6

Anonymous #6 1d

White supremacist yes, everything else, no I’m not saying evil women don’t exist I’m saying men’s obsession with power leads them to do more evil things and women understand that there is a balance when it comes to power success and inherit domination. Men have proven time and time again that for whatever reason they don’t . I’m not saying if we get rid of 75% of the male population everything will be happy happy happyyy. But I’m saying it will be a hell of a lot of fucking better.

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

I’m not diminishing the harm that it does to women. The abuse, discrimination and oppression that women have faced because of the patriarchy has been horrendous, and it’s a good thing that they’re beginning to get the rights and equality that they deserve. But you can’t just write it off as “men only benefit from the patriarchy”. It harms both men and women.

8

Anonymous #6 1d

Yes definitely but again it benefits men a lot more. A man hasn’t been drafted into war since the 1960’s or 1970’s a women is being sexually harassed/ assaulted as we speak.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

dude seriously what are your standards for “incompetent” or “unempathetic”. like how are you even gonna determine who should live and who should die across the entire world? are you gonna make everyone take a “deserves to live” test?

8

Anonymous #6 1d

yes I acknowledge that the patriarchy significantly benefits men. I’m just saying you can’t write it off as “men have it all”.

8

Anonymous OP 1d

And yes homophobia does affect queer men but that doesn’t mean queer men don’t benefit from the patriarchy as well they are just seen as lesser than a straight man.

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

Yesssss that’s why we’re getting rid of the 75% you seeeeee not all men just the majority

-1

Anonymous #6 1d

Yes.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

ok again how are you even gonna determine who lives and who dies? are you gonna make all the men take a “deserves to live” test? and what evidence do you have to support your claim that 75-85 percent of men deserve death?

7

Anonymous OP 1d

ok and what’s your metric for “deserves to live?” do you really trust your opinion, the opinion of one person, to be a perfect moral judge of who deserves to live and die?

6

Anonymous OP 1d

By incompetent I mean emotionally, socially and intellectually incompetent. If you’re stupid you die. You can’t empathize we someone you’re not related to you die. You can’t hold a conversation with a woman you die. You’ve harassed a woman is any way, you die. You can’t name at least 10 counties in Africa you die. You’ve raised your voice at a woman you die. You don’t shave your ass and wipe your butt have you poop you die.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

ok wow. so if someone’s only crime is being socially awkward and struggling in convos he should die.

5

Anonymous OP 1d

I also find it hilarious that you keep bringing up empathy but I sure don’t see the empathy in advocating for killing 3 billion people

4

Anonymous #6 1d

You believe in the madonna whore complex you die. If you can’t say I love you to your son you die. If you’re a fascist you die. If you’re racist you die. Shall I go on

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

you: “Everyone needs empathy and those who don’t have it need to die!” Also you: “Kill someone if they can’t name 10 countries in Africa!” Well aren’t you an absolute pinnacle of empathy, I can just see the empathy radiating out from you

8

Anonymous #6 1d

Listen I’m not here to listen to you bitch and moan about the personhood of these men I am concerned about what is best for our species and this is what is best for our species. If you can tell me why we should tolerate the existence of 75%-85% of these men, and the benefits I’ll surrender. No religion is allowed but you haven’t brought that up once and I am proud of you for that. And do not say that women are evil too. Yes there are women out there who murder babies but that is not our concern.

-1

Anonymous OP 1d

Dude someone does not deserve to die just because they can’t hold a conversation or they can’t name 10 countries in Africa.

6

Anonymous #5 1d

We literally have

6

Anonymous OP 1d

Did Thanos post this?

6