Confessions on Sidechat | Circumcision is not comparable to female genital mutilation and men that say that are ignorant as hell

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Confessions 1d

Circumcision is not comparable to female genital mutilation and men that say that are ignorant as hell

163

Anonymous 1d

I was literally just thinking about this, and historically they have different backgrounds, where male circumcision was used for health benefits in different cultures across ancient history, in Egypt, Greece and Rome. It made a rise back in the Victorian era as a way to prevent infections bc people didn’t know how to clean under the foreskin. Where FGM provides no health benefits at all, causes more harm to the female body, and it is used bc certain cultures believe women do not deserve pleasure

Anonymous 22h

It is comparable, one is just normalized

Anonymous 13h

🕹️

Anonymous 1d

You are all dumb af. Male circumcision desensitizes the tip of the penis with circumcised men being four times more likely to have erectal dysfunction later in life. I get the arguments of it, but cleaning is very easy and if someone wants it aesthetically they can go ahead and get it as an adult. There is no reason to do it unconsentually to babies. Both are bad and it doesn’t have to be a contest. But all the Gen Z morons want to bring the whole “I proudly stand with women” attitude

Anonymous 1d

Wah wah

-18

Anonymous 1d

They are absolutely comparable, they are equivalent define both as genital multination. You dont get to be special because someone does it a special way

-23

Anonymous

#1 1d

Exhibit A

Anonymous

#4 1d

In a way he is right but female ‘circumcision’ as some call it has more drawbacks and is more painful. While the reasons may differ both are mutilations and everyone should be left as God made them.

-7

Anonymous

#1 1d

FGM is done at an older age, with no anesthesia and no medical care. The girl is held down, literally cut in the most painful spot. No man even remembers circumcision stfu

Anonymous 1d

woah this is a crazy fucking statement

Anonymous

#1 1d

They are both genital mutilation but one is way more painful, generally done on older children and without anesthesia, and is gone specifically to objectify and abuse the victim. The other is done on a baby for aesthetic or hygiene reasons. Both are bad and should be banned but you can’t ignore the fact that one is way more barbaric. (Plus there’s intersex ‘corrective’ surgeries that even less people care about, which hardly ever get brought into these discussions.)

Anonymous 1d

I’d like to preface that I consider myself a very patient person. However! Occasionally, someone can make me SO EXTREMELY angry that I gotta come back after a breather. So excuse me while I take that breather :)

Anonymous

#9 1d

Aesthetic and hygiene are both bs answers and other than maybe religious practices both should be abolished but genuinely fgm is the biggest issue out of both idk why I was downvoted on my last comment

Anonymous

#5 1d

I agree that aesthetic and hygiene are BS reasons. I think that circumcising a child for hygiene is like chopping off their hands because boys can’t wash them. I was just saying that’s the reasons why people do it.

Anonymous

#9 1d

No I get you i was just saying

Anonymous

#11 1d

Circumcision was not common practice in Greece and Rome. And on top of that what is this whole argument here? Both of them are bad. Why does everything have to be contest. Some of these posts here are outrageously stupid.

Anonymous

#14 1d

into everything in order to prove how progressive and morally superior they are. I fucking hate this mentality. It is time move on from this nonsense.

Anonymous

#14 1d

yeah i hate women too. come on guys stop being so moronic and standing with women. why does nobody wanna play with our forskins together in my awesome treehouse?

Anonymous

#11 1d

Muh health benefits

Anonymous

#15 22h

You’re funny, but that is not what I said. You’re debating kinda like Trump here.

Anonymous

#14 17h

i wish we could desensitize your penis’ even more you weirdo lustful freaks.

Anonymous

#18 16h

Why do you hate lustful people? Are you anorgasmic? Good luck.

-1

Anonymous

#18 16h

Horny ppl make more ppl, bro skipped natural selection in biology class 😭🥀

-1

Anonymous

#14 15h

no im talking about mens lust specifically. male sexual entitlement to womens bodies. yall being r*pists. quit being dumb

Anonymous

#18 15h

Ok, so you are anorgasmic.

-2

Anonymous

#14 15h

ok so youre a rapist got it

Anonymous

#18 15h

I never said that I hate people who have consensual sex for you to make that assumption. But you expressed hate for people who experience sexual pleasure.

-1

Anonymous

#14 15h

no i specified what i meant and specifically said men with male sexual entitlement and rapists

Anonymous

#14 15h

you literally replied “anorgasmic” to me saying RAPISTS. youre fucking disgusting

Anonymous

#18 15h

I don’t know what planet you live in but the majority of men are neither those things. You just want to see them like this because you have a lot of anger. And I get it. It really sucks to want something and not get it unlike everyone else.

Anonymous

#14 15h

i live on earth where men commit 98-99% of rapes WORLDFUCKINGWIDE. quit being a miserable prick

Anonymous

#18 15h

Did you graduate elementary school? I said most men are not like that. If a small minority of men commit 99% of the rapes that doesn’t mean that most men are rapists. Our math and statistics education has really failed you. Or maybe you were homeschooled by morons who knows.

-1

Anonymous

#14 15h

the mental gymnastics you did around that one is crazy. u def have fucking allegations against you. “a small minority of men” tf r u talking about its the majority.

Anonymous

#14 14h

You deleted your comments. Nice, self-awareness is the first step.