Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
“She consented to have sex and do drugs.” Ok? If she consented to having sex with 3 but not a 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th, that’s rape. And she could’ve asked the original 3 to stop and they kept going. That’s rape. Consent can be revoked at any time.
upvote 22 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 23h

Read the whole updated testimony, they did end up stopping a few times

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

If you read her testimony from after it happened she only had sex with 4 of them. Guy 1 and 2, then guy 2 and 3, then guy 1 and 4.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 23h

They didn’t fully stop. Otherwise this wouldn’t even be in the news. That’s rape. Stop means stop. Not stop for 5 minutes and then continue. Hope that helps

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 23h

Its in the news because its being dredged up after happening like 2 years ago. If we are talking about consent everyone in this story was drunk and/or high on ketamine and couldn’t clearly consent. Seriously, read the updated testimony.

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 23h

tell me you didn’t read the testimony without telling me

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 23h

Its been updated, its called an ongoing trial for a reason

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 23h

i replied to the other person not you

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 22h

Tell me you’re stupid without telling me

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 22h

😖

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 22h

Oh lol, didnt see that

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

Why are you defending this so hard? It’s weird bruh

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Read the whole 101 page civil suit that the prosecutor now has access to which sites a lot of defendants (including Cornell) and how the cupd obstructed prosecutable evidence.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 17h

Again another creep

upvote 3 downvote