Confessions on Sidechat | The reason women are traditionally taught to hide their body from men is not because the female body is inherently sexual. It's because men are inherently vile.

Sidechat

Download

Join communities on Sidechat Download

Confessions 6d

The reason women are traditionally taught to hide their body from men is not because the female body is inherently sexual. It's because men are inherently vile.

216

Anonymous 6d

no theyre taught being vile is okay saying inherently is like saying oh its not their fault they cant help it

Anonymous 5d

Can we normalize not generalizing all men?

Anonymous 5d

Damn

Anonymous 5d

Inherently or intrinsically? Inherently would mean it’s something that’s inherited and can be fixed, intrinsic would mean this is always the case

Anonymous 5d

I think people will become what society enables. I don’t think women should dress like jezebels around men because it is frankly just damaging to the man’s psyche.

-3

Anonymous

#1 5d

Idk why ppl r downvoting you’re SO right

Anonymous

#1 5d

okay you’re so fucking right

Anonymous

#3 5d

because hopelessness and bio essentialism is more appealing to people than any kind of actually feminist thought

Anonymous

#6 5d

Inherently: in a permanent, essential, or characteristic way. Synonyms: intrinsic You should look into linguistic prescriptivism vs descriptivism also

Anonymous

#7 5d

you thinking something doesn’t make it true

Anonymous

#7 5d

Ur gross

Anonymous

#5 5d

The sky is blue type statement

-1

Anonymous

#3 5d

You should look into the self objectification affect. Also a man being surrounded by women at all times especially ones who don’t cover is just not good for him.

-1

Anonymous

#7 5d

that’s just not true seeing a woman’s skin is not damaging to men thus is just ridiculous. you’ve not only completely erased the existence of all gay people but you’re just saying nonsense and acting as if the things you believe without proof are fact. purity culture and taboos around talking about sex and consent actually create the kinds of barriers that lead to miscommunication, objectification, and over sexualization and just creating more of that will not fix the problem

Anonymous

#5 5d

I didn’t realize i ereased gay people:( Where am i? Ahhh i am dissapearing. 🙄

Anonymous

#7 5d

you’re dumb as rocks. saying that women dressing “like jezebels” around men is entirely focused around men’s heterosexual attraction to women and ignores everybody else including women’s sexuality, the sexuality of people who experience attraction towards people of the same gender, nonbinary and intersex people, people who don’t feel sexual attraction or feel it very faintly, etc

Anonymous

#5 5d

Discussing subject A does not assert nor imply the nonexistentance of subject B If i discuss how China’s persecution of Kenya I am not underplaying the british persecution of kenya or denying it, I am just discussing china’s at the moment

Anonymous

#9 5d

No generalizing is both good and necessary

-1

Anonymous

#7 5d

yeah but you are saying “women have this affect on men” and “women specifically should not dress the way they want because of that affect” implying the reverse or other scenarios is not significant in this scenario. not to mention you’re just factually wrong