Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
words have tangible definitions & baked-in connotations. when you fail to choose your words carefully (i.e. think critically about whether what you wrote actually conveys the precise meaning you intend), you aren’t being misinterpreted, you just misspoke
upvote 6 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

that’s not “just semantics”, it’s a basic facet of how language operates… other people clocking insinuations in your speech that you claim to have not consciously intended is not an “it’s not that deep” issue. everybody please learn how to close-read so you can get better at interpreting and articulating language

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

You’re so articulate

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Words are extremely malleable and sometimes you’re just not understanding because your strict adherence to rules. For example, “fuck you, you fucking fuck”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Or “her pussy spoke to me.”

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

neither of these examples run contrary to what I said about definitions and connotations. this is just figurative usage

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I’m also not sure where the “you’re just not understanding” part came from. this post was not me getting defensive over misunderstanding someone else, just expressing a general frustration

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

thanks for the armchair diagnosis and ensuing condescension!

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Okay let’s take this reply. Definitionally, condescension requires an insinuation of superiority. However, the structure of your sentence conveys overwhelming moral superiority. Do you recognize the linguistic contradiction here?

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

learn to differentiate between irritated sarcasm and moralizing condescension please

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

and while we’re at it, you’re doing a great job of demonstrating my point—sentence structure alone has no way to convey moral superiority. that would have to be you defensively projecting

upvote 1 downvote