Anonymous #1 16h

Also they DEFINITELY are designed for women

-3

Anonymous #1 16h

First crash dummy modeled after female anatomy (rather than a scaled down version of male crash dummies) didn’t come out until 2022, its only now being implemented in crash tests, it was a necessary change because women sustain a disproportionate amount of car crash injuries partly due to design flaws, so no cars weren’t made for women in mind

10

Anonymous #2 15h

They are. They were just called child sized dummies before that. It’s optics not actual design. When SUVs got mainstream around y2k manufacturers thought consumers wanted them for off-roading. Five years later they realized that the boost in suv sales came from women buying cars, so actually most features of SUVs were designed specifically for women

-2

Anonymous #1 15h

The child sized dummies were in fact smaller scale versions of the male test dummies, they were nothing like the current THOR-05F model, what you’re referring to is marketing choices not safety regulations which we know is more about optics than anything

7

Anonymous #2 15h

Dude yes it is lol. Thats was entirely optics. The entire car was designed around women it’s not just market choice

-2

Anonymous #1 15h

Did their crash tests use women modeled dummies or just child dummies with breast attachments though? Humanetics’ model accounts for how the seatbelt sits on the body due to pelvis, and other differences in bone structure (added pic for comparison). Women are more prone to certain injuries in a crash which is why they’re trying to figure out what can be done to make things safer (see article above). A feminine design doesn’t make up for thorough safety testing.

4

Anonymous #2 14h

Ill share each side of the table separately because yikyak keeps shrinking the text to nothing

5

Anonymous #2 10h

That’s just basic technology improvements. Male crash dummies have also gotten more advanced. You’re acting like no one ever thought to test how women would react in a crash, and that is so clearly not true

-1

Anonymous #1 10h

Ok so bro didn’t read the article, acting like everything you said wasn’t directly pulled out of your ass like last nights dildo, cool it with the sass I could’ve been a lot more rude to you

3

Anonymous #2 10h

That wasn’t meant to be sass, you’re clearly emotionally attached to this idea despite it obviously not being true

0

Anonymous #1 10h

Emotionally attached by sharing sources? Have a good night man this is a waste of time

6

Anonymous #2 9h

Yeah that’s what I meant emotionally attached to sharing sources. Very mature

0