Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Democracy should be renamed as Dumbocracy. Dumb people vote in mass for morons who rule over them
upvote 4 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

When people realize 99% of Dems are complacent with the evils of Republicans and don’t actually want change, we might actually make some progress in this country.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

What's your solution to government then

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

Not the best solution, but ever-changing IQ tests to qualify as a voter and set a baseline like 110/120. Bundle them with driver’s license tests or something. We may need to make people retake them every few years. 100% optional, but you would need to qualify to vote.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

oh but we’re against photo ID to vote 🫩make it make sense

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Lmao, no. IQ tests are not a reliable depiction of someone's actual intelligence. It's been proven over and over.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

Correct, but better than having nothing like the “anything goes” we do now. As more discoveries are made, we can implement those tests.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Putting restrictions like that only invites corruption. What starts as a limit of 100 or 110 eventually becomes 120, then 130, and eventually the limit is 200 and, miraculously, the rich and powerful all manage to score highly (by paying for it of course) and leave everyone else unrepresented.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

That was just an idea; there could be others. With advances in technology, tests can be made fair, and scores stored on distributed ledgers, for example. Yes, there may still be corruption; it can be reduced, not eliminated. Also, representation for “everyone” and not “all qualified people” is the root cause. We cannot use the lowest common denominator as a benchmark.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

But basing someone's ability to vote on a subjective quality is inherently unfair. Qualifications like "American citizen" or "18 or older" are objective, as in you are definitively one or the other. There's no opinion on whether or not someone is 18 or older or a citizen, just the fact that they are (or aren't). Subjective qualities like intelligence are not a good reference point because there is so much gray area there. Someone who's smart to me might be stupid to you, for example.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 1d

You can try and make intelligence an objective fact, but at the end of the day we will never be able to obtain a reliable, numerical indicator of intelligence that truly represents all factors of somebody's mind. It's simply not possible.

upvote 1 downvote