Anonymous littlepenis4.8 5w

Prominent maybe but effective? Hell nah, most of his economic policies put the public in the hands of corporations, and most of his focus was on expanding Germany’s borders. The only boons he brought to germany were the ones he took from other countries. Plus he was on meth

1

Anonymous OP 5w

He lead an entire country to believe in some wild ass shit and nearly won a world war singlehanded lol. That’s effective. Correct? No Effective and influential? Absolutely He was effective in carrying out his ideals. You don’t have to like them or agree with them or even think they’re good but he had a goal and he nearly succeeded in it. That’s effective lol

-1

Anonymous littlepenis4.8 5w

That makes him a good propagandist, but when he actually had to lead he fell short almost every time. He underestimated basically everyone else in Europe, had no control over his allies, let many of his best scientists flee to America, and screwed over his people just to get at the jews, the holocaust wasn’t even successful. He was a dogshit leader

1

Anonymous OP 5w

Every leader in the history of forever has been dogshit lol. Everyone eventually fails. Nobody has been able to, in such a short amount of time, rally an entire nation to do all of the crazy shit that Germany did. That’s makes him effective. You’re confusing and conflating effective & successful. They don’t mean the same thing

0