Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
The issue is people expect others to be socialists and share because they think others are rich and have “excess”. They don’t want to share themselves as they feel like they don’t have enough. Its about sharing whatever you have regardless of others
hot take: if you’re not at least somewhat of a socialist then you really aren’t a serious follower of Christ’s teachings
upvote 14 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 1d

your first sentence is a bit of a sloppy oversimplified misinterpretation of how socialist politics operate, but I will agree as a leftist myself that *some* self-identified socialists, leftists, communists etc do have a real problem with hypocrisy in terms of not living up to their own ideological standards

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

everybody’s still growing though, no one is really a perfect reflection of their own belief system. I know I sure have blind spots of my own. but the existence of people who need to work on themselves doesn’t discredit the broader movement “share what you have” *is* socialist-aligned sentiment though! or maybe that’s what you were saying too and I misinterpreted you…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

This was a statement about Jesus’s teachings maybe misworded. The teaching is to share what you have regardless of how much you have. The political idea makes people think that others have more and they need to share.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

Like a politician will talk about billionaires should share but never give away 4 of their own mansions or 80% of their 20M stock worth. Same concept funnels down to the activist maybe at a lesser net worth. Simplification, but everyone wants others to share.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

rich politicians are scummy in general, when I say “at least somewhat of a socialist” I’m moreso talking about believing in and acting on socialist principles—a good example is the thing you were saying about Jesus’ teachings, genuinely! that really is a socialist mindset—within your own life / community, as opposed to which politicians you support

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

I mean I do think socialist politicians tend to be the least evil we can get in the US, but above all I’m primarily focused on an anarchocommunist-leaning approach where your “politics” = how you apply your ideology to the way you move through the world, de-emphasizing the electoral aspect to some extent

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

(but again, like I said, I’m also not here to overlook the reality that *some* self-described socialists / communists / leftists etc can move in hypocritical ways & lack self-awareness)

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 1d

I used to wonder but it all makes sense when you realize it’s a career/business. An activist/politician does this to get fame and later power & wealth. The followers are just useful idiots in the game. Most career socialists you see in the media are all multi millionaires.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

what you’re saying is definitely true of politicians, hard agree, but it’s definitely Not true of socialist activists who aren’t running for office or working the upper rungs of a literal business. the vast majority of leftist activism involves zero access to fame or wealth—it’s stuff like ground-level organizing around meeting local community needs, or disseminating educational info, or participating in protests to either draw attention to a social issue or apply pressure on people in power

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 1d

I can’t stress enough that “socialist politicians” and “leftists / socialists” are two vastly different categories. no disrespect intended, but I didn’t actually realize there were people who aren’t aware of that distinction. it’s like how “democrat politician” is a different category from “democrats, in general”, where the latter just refers to like… everyday people you see around town

upvote 1 downvote