Idk why you’re trying to turn this into an argument, there’s nothing to even argue about. I just stated the numbers and somehow that means I’m defending rapists or saying something about the standard for men. The standard for women and men is the same: stay away from rapists and report when anything happens. Idk what you want to try to argue differently
My point with the last sentence was that men don’t report it because we don’t know rapists. The only people who hide rapists are other rapists. Same with pedophiles. Idk about you, but I don’t know of any pedophiles or rapists because I don’t have any in my life. And if I did have any in my life, once I found out, I’d make sure they were no longer in my life or anyone else’s as best I could
My point is you probably DO have some in your life and don’t even know it. And a lot of the time the act is rationalized to the point of where guys do not believe they did it. So, maybe the standard should be a little higher than simply avoiding self proclaimed rapists. Your post gives off “nice guy” energy.
No I DO NOT have any in my life. By your logic, YOU probably have some in YOUR life too that you don’t know about, so why aren’t you reporting them? Do you see the flaw in your logic? How do you report something you don’t know about? Both times I’ve ever told someone “this person is weird, they’ll probably SA you if you aren’t careful and I’d stay away from them if I were you”, the people didn’t listen and they got SA’d. Literally what else do you want me to do?
I’m aware that it’s not always creepy men, but trust me, men are VERY acutely aware of when someone has or could do something, and we try to stop it in advance or report it when it happens. I’m sure it’s similar for women with other women. Please elaborate on how I’m “dodging accountability”by telling you that men should report other men when they know there’s a problem. If anything that seems pretty accountable
I’m not white knighting myself at all. If anything, you are by implying that you’re completely separate from the issue. Obviously they’re everywhere, and could be anyone, and obviously we ask each other if we’ve noticed anything bad going on whenever someone we know gets involved with a girl. We’re not being willfully ignorant. We’re having false pretense put on us that we defend rapists when nobody does that except other rapists
Btw sorry for the delayed response, had a class to go to. Also I thought about it a bit, and I think the reason that I personally don’t see or interact with as many rape situations as others might is because nobody in my circle really does hookups, so there’s really not as much to talk about as if one of us was very active
It’s not disingenuous. Ted Bundy was charming as fuck and his wife had no idea what kind of a person he was until he was caught. Look, I’m not accusing you of anything, I’m just saying it’s ignorant to just celebrate that none of your friends are obviously rapists. It’s giving similar energy to saying “I’m not racist. None of my friends have ever lynched anyone.”
I mean yeah, but the flaw in your logic is in your own statement. If Ted Bundy’s own wife didn’t know he was a monster, you can’t really say that it’s all men’s fault that other men rape. I’ll use a snake for this analogy. So, some people know to stay away from snakes with triangular heads because they’re venomous, so they tell others to stay away from those snakes as well as venomous snakes with common, recognizable markings on their bodies. So, everyone who knows that stays away from those
(continuing because I ran out of room) So if you see a venomous snake near others, you point it out and do what you can to keep them and yourself from getting bit and then steer clear of it. If the snake isn’t next to you, you don’t know it exists unless someone has told you about it. If it’s bitten someone, you’ll only know if it’s bitten someone if you see the bite or someone tells you about the bite. The only other way you’ll know is if you see the snake bite someone
The only situation where you can do anything about it is if you see the snake before it bites someone. At that point, if you do nothing to prevent it, THEN you are accountable for it. In the other cases, it’s impossible to know until something happens. Now for snakes that aren’t venomous or don’t have obvious markings to see, etc. Regular looking snakes can bite too. The same scenarios go for them too, though. If a snake bites someone, and you don’t know the snake nor the person it bit,
…you’ll never know the snake bit someone unless you hear about it second hand. It’s as if neither the snake nor the bite exist, so how are you going to do something to prevent the snake from biting in the future if you don’t know any information about the snake or that it even exists? You can’t. Even if a snake you don’t know bites someone you do, you’ll only know if someone tells you about the bite, you see signs of the bite, or the person who got bit confides in you. Otherwise, you won’t know
The only situation where you’re accountable for the bite and can prevent future bites is if you witnessed the snake rearing its head getting ready to strike and you still allowed the person who got bit to get too close without either removing them from the snake or removing the snake from them
So I get that anyone can be a snake that bites someone, but it’s unfair to say that it’s so obvious that it’s a simple task to hold them accountable. If you don’t know they exist (ie a stranger assaults your friend but you never knew the stranger beforehand), there’s literally nothing you can do in that case. If you did know, and there were literally 0 signs, you can’t do anything until after the fact, in which case you definitely should do something (duh)
The literal ONLY case where the bystander can be held accountable is if they witnessed the snake preparing to bite, saw the victim approach the snake (whether they were made aware of the snake or not), and still stood by and did nothing. Hate to say it, but this is the least likely scenario out of all of them because nobody (at least from my experience and observations from the time I’ve had on this earth, maybe it’s different for you) willingly lets the snake bite someone
And if it is different for you, I’m sorry to hear that you’ve been surrounded by those types of people and experienced that complacency. The point of this post was to say that most men aren’t like that, but the ones who are are EXTRA evil and unfortunately more than make up for everyone else being normal
The point of my comment is to say there’s more men like that than you think. Your post was a tone deaf attempt to say “not all guys are bad” by referencing how 6% are serial rapists. That doesn’t account for others who have only done it once, or have done it without realizing it. You tried to flex with what should be the bare minimum. And your reaction is proving my point. I’m pointing out that people are less innocent than you think, and you’re hiding behind denial.
It actually does account for those who have only done it once, or have done it without realizing. If you ACTUALLY read what I said instead of getting flustered at the idea that genuinely not all men are bad, and that it’s just a very small amount so your demonization of all men isn’t valid anymore, you’d see that it’s the AVERAGE amount of victims, not total. It accounts for those who have done it just once and those who have done it but not been called on it yet, because- (character limit)
-because that number came from a pool of men in general. The number includes those who were known to have done it, AND those who had not yet or did not know they had yet. So yes, it’s 6%. For my own curiosity, I’d like to ask you what you personally think the number is. What percentage of men do you think have raped or will rape someone during their lives?
In what way is my point tone deaf? Please elaborate. Also, since you seem to think you have this all figured out, how do you find those who “aren’t so innocent” as I believe? Please tell me exactly how you’d do so, in detail. If you think it’s a conversation, detail exactly who you’d talk to, and what you’d say. Not just “I’d talk to my friends about it”
I’ve already elaborated. I’m not demonizing anyone, I’m acknowledging that we don’t live in a world of pure good and evil like in cartoons. Once again, you’re flexing what should be a basic standard. You’re not friends with any self proclaimed rapists, congratulations. You’re just another fragile man that doesn’t want to accept someone you know might have committed SA before.
You really haven’t elaborated anything. The only thing you’ve done is consistently misread and misconstrue what I’ve said. So please, give the example like I asked. Clearly you think I need it, so it shouldn’t be too hard for ya. Also yes, I do know someone who has SA’d. They’ve been cut off from my life for a few years now, and I think I can speak for most men when I say that if that ever happens again, we’d all do the same 💀 no clue why me saying “I’m glad I don’t know any rapists” is bad
In what way am I flexing not knowing a rapist? I already told you, most people aren’t. It’s not a flex if it’s something most people have, but I don’t think there’s anything wrong with being glad to not be around rapists. Would you rather me be in a circle of rapists because that’s exactly how all your comments read and pretty much the only point you’ve been making
If you really care about the issue and not just demonizing men, you’d happily give the example and advice I asked for. Instead, you’re just dodging it because you know that’s not your intention. Your intention isn’t to bring positive attention and change to the issue, it’s to put down people who you’ve never met with baseless assumptions
I can say it again since I guess you didn’t catch it the first time. Give me an example of the conversation you’d have with your friends if you were a man since that’s something you suggested earlier. The questions you’d ask, why you’d ask them, how you’d know who to ask, how you’d know what to believe or not, etc. How would you, with your expert detective skills, sniff out the rapists?
Because you’re downplaying instances where it’s done by regular ass people who believe their intentions were good. You’re patting men on the back for not being friends with obvious rapists, which for the tenth fucking time, is a very low standard. I’m literally just saying more people do it than you think, and it could be people you know. Stay vigilant. I’m done talking to you. I’ve had enough of you spamming me with comments like a senile old man that just discovered the internet.
Mind you this is also the exact argument racists use with “13% of the population but commit half the crimes” when they call all black people criminals. You’re literally doing the exact same thing to men and are so blinded by whatever made up percentage of men you think are evil in your head that you cannot fathom that the world is not as much of a hellscape as you think it is. Literally just go live life and you’ll see that
I’m not downplaying anything at all. If you scroll up, you’ll see that I said that nobody supports rapists. Doesn’t matter who the perpetrator is, rape is rape. I’m not patting anyone on the back, I’m saying men will not willingly hang around a rapist like many think we just openly do. I’m telling you it’s much more nuanced than you think it is, and you’re trying to tell me that it’s much more nuanced than I think it is at the same time when you wouldn’t even know since you’re not even a man.
Never once did I say that should be the standard. I agree that it’s the bare minimum. What I’m saying is that most people think men don’t even do that, and I’m saying that’s silly because obviously nobody wants to be around rapists 💀 do you disagree? Also no, it’s really not more people than I think because the number literally comes from studies and surveys. So it’s not an “I think”. I know, and you do too even if you won’t say so. If you go back and read what I’ve said, I’ve explained-
-multiple times that men stay vigilant and how they do so, yet you continue to parrot yourself and misconstrue what I said to make your fantasy hell of a reality seem like truth where rapists are everywhere. Never did I disagree that it could be anyone, and you’re right, a lot more innocent people do it than most would think. However, they’re still within that 6%. Doesn’t change that 94% of men never have and never will rape someone
If you’d like me to link the presentation (mind you, done by a woman) on this topic where she does a pretty good job of explaining what I’ve been saying, I can try to find a link from it. I think the part that stands out the most is when she asks the audience what they think the percentage is and a lot of people answer 40%+ with someone even saying 90%, and then it goes silent when she says 6% 💀