Ik that’s a really crude way of estimation or getting a sense of that kind of thing but idk I don’t think it’s the worst logic

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Maybe I’m just too dumb too realize why it’s stupid

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Or just ignorant of something important factor to do with how these statistics are compiled or whether dunbars number applies to people you’re merely aware of Plenty of people on fb have friends that number in the 1,000’s so that’s kind of a mystery to me how… that’s possible Maybe I have actually heard of about 10,000 ppl in my life. And applying the concept of dunbars number in a manner it was never meant for and in a way that’s fundamentally incorrect about what the number even represents.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

A social graph you can map and keep track of data to do with, rather than just people whom you’re aware of or have encountered even once or by word of mouth

1

Words with friends And like Roblox 😐. And candy crush, raking in billions every quarter. Not individually but yeah. Well roblox is individually.

1

Anonymous OP 1d

I think. I’m pretty sure. Don’t lynch me if it turns out it’s actually like 800 m / quarter

1