i think the committee did it the way the should given the current rules, but i do not think the current rules r the right way to do it
6
Anonymous4w
not bama
-2
Anonymous#14w
Alabama went to their conference championship and had ten wins in the regular season. They should've been the 10 seed for the conference championship loss but I didn't see a reason to drop them from the playoffs.
20
Anonymous#14w
what #2 said. ofc if we included conference champ round they shld not be included, but that’s like an extra credit assignment, can’t count against them
1
AnonymousOP4w
when u lose by 21 yes it should
1
Anonymous#14w
also can you explain why bama jumped notre dame the week before after barely beating a 5-7 auburn team
1
Anonymous#14w
then why play in it?
1
AnonymousOP4w
u ever get points off for getting an extra question wrong on a test?
1
Anonymous#14w
and honestly the only explanation i have for u is bama should been over them from the start
1
AnonymousOP4w
and i’m a big 10 fan
2
AnonymousOP4w
dont agree with that part but fair enough. regardless doesn’t make sense with how the committee did it.
4
AnonymousOP4w
because if they would’ve won they would’ve been significantly rewarded and probably would’ve gotten a first rd bye or at the very least would’ve gotten to play one of the G5 teams.
1
Anonymous#14w
i think they certainly wouldn’t have gotten a first round bye. i do agree they may have moved up more then should have. but win or loss i think they should be in and i think win or loss they shldve been the 9