Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
I’d take this for my top 25. It doesn’t take how close a game was into account tho so…
8 upvotes, 6 comments. Sidechat image post by Anonymous in College Football. "I’d take this for my top 25. It doesn’t take how close a game was into account tho so…"
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 12h

Uhh… USC should be moved below Oregon at least and everyone in between moved up 1. And having Texas A&M and Oklahoma without Oklahoma State is blasphemous

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11h

their loss to tulsa hurts them a lot, and their oregon win doesn’t look so good now that we know more about oregon. WVU and Murray (i think) aren’t rated that high to give them a boost.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11h

Oregon’s only loss is to Ok State and they beat USC after their QB faced attempted murder. Ok State and Oregon are good. Ok State is definitely better than Oklahoma

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11h

its just there have been 3 other games for Ok State. This is a rating system. I didn’t do the math 🤷🏻‍♂️, and because it’s completely “objective” it misses a few things (like win margin and injuries).

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 11h

I mean I guess that’s fair but there’s no such thing as an “objective” rating system even when done by a computer. That’s why BCS was thrown out

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 11h

There’s just no reason to put a 2 loss team in the rankings at this point in the season when there’s 1 loss and 0 loss P4 teams that get left out. That should show you the “objective” system is broken

upvote 1 downvote