They were ranked and as you can see, are ranked correctly because of their loses. USF deserves their spot, they beat two ranked teams with Florida and Boise St. and FSU beat a top-10 team Illinois and Iowa-State havenât actually played anyone worth their ranking. Cause neither team has played any competition.
4/5 teams went to the national championshipâŚ. Of course, TN and GA lost their earlier games into it. But, Texas lost to ND who played and got beat by OSU who were the national champions. Texas keeps their spot because they lost to the champs, the others rank anywhere between 5-15. I also HEAVILY disagreed with South Carolinaâs ranking, they wouldâve barely been in the rankings. Stop acting like Illinois and Iowa State have done anything worth a damn. Theyâll finish with a mid bowl at best.
This is some shit someone says when there isnât any validity to their statements. âLast seasonâ is my proofâŚon WHY those teams deserve a number, Illinois went 9-3, Iâd actually would say theyâre at 18/19 if these polls werenât so biased in what these shitty âjournalistsâ where saying. Iowa State played Kansas St and now everyone thinks theyâre good. Trust me, they would be killed if they played any of these other ranked teams.
The literacy rates in your state must be below average. They both havenât done shit, and when they doâŚI will agree they will deserve being ranked. Last year they didnât do shit. This year, they wonât be shit. The teams you mentioned went to the playoffs besides South Carolina, which I didnât think they were good either. They for sure arenât a top 10 team. Get the fuck outta my mentions, and read a book.
Nope I donât live in the south which is where all the low literacy rates are. And why not bitch about South Carolinaâs ranking then and only Illinois and Iowa State? But yeah Clemson and Tennessee looked really good in the playoffs they definitely deserved to be there! Might as well put SMU in the top 10 too then since they were in the playoffs last year! Btw Iowa state finished with a better record than both Clemson and Tennessee last year. Illinois with better record than Clemson & same as TN
Whatâs funny is that you would know some of the worst literacy rates are in the north. LikeâŚsub 25% Whatâs hysterical is, if you READ my previous comments I had problems with South Carolina being ranked anywhere above 15. Wanna talk about last yearâs playoffs? Yeah alright, Arizona St, SMU, and Clemson had no reason to be there. However, it would be a match between the Big 10 and the SEC and no one would want to watch that. It would be boring, no one wants to watch that, not even OSU fans...
New York, California, New Jersey, and New Mexico are the worst. You tell me, out of those four...which one is a southern state? Of course, I know the Midwest struggles with drinking but damn. Donât worry though, whatever school your dickriding for will absolutely go 6-6 and *might* get a bowl. Of course, thatâs if they actually win anything meaningful. Iâll enjoy watching better teams play the game.
âWith the exceptionâ none of this is correct. The lowest states are: 1. New York 2. California 3. New Jersey 4. Texas 5. Flordia Ok, so two southern states are the worst...meanwhile, the flyover states have dropped over 20%. Iâm not even a southerner and youâre still using shitty statistics as factual evidence...damn son you really hate your literature and reading classes huh?
So you and I BOTH know this is ridiculous đ ok, so weâre on the same page here. Listen, I mean no ill will, I actually root for an FCS team, if anything my question was that, a genuine one. Personally, though, I donât see them going far, theyâre small fish, in EXTREMELY small ponds. Enjoy the ranking now though, next week half of these teams will probably lose their spots. âđ˝
Iâm just saying thereâs no way NJ is #1 in education but at the bottom in literacy. đ Thatâs impossible. Itâs WEEK 2!! The 2nd week of the season! These rankings donât mean shit! Nothing. Nada. Yall beating a damn dead horse here. A horse that hasnât even been conceived yet! đ