Anonymous #2 17h

2004 proved we needed a playoff when there were 3 undeafeated power conference teams and one of them got left out. Honestly an 8 team playoff would have been the most we ever get but here we are

7

Anonymous OP 17h

My point is the structure of college football is rapidly changing bc it has unique challenges compared to other sports

5

Anonymous OP 15h

Not when a 10 seed made the natty. 16 would be perfect, it gets rid of the biggest problem with the current format (the bye) and it lets top seeds host a playoff game. But they want more sec teams in so 16 isn’t enough

1

Anonymous #3 14h

If a 24 seed made the natty would that prove to you 24 teams are necessary?

1

Anonymous #4 14h

It would surely disprove the biggest argument against it 💀 I’m not in favor of it, but more teams is better than less. I’m sick of brand bias.

1

Anonymous #3 13h

How? Any team can beat any other team on any given day. It’s not like you would learn anything new if the 24 seed runs the table.

1

Anonymous #3 13h

The argument isn’t that #24 can’t win it all, it’s that the wouldn’t deserve to.

1

Anonymous #4 12h

Who decides who deserves to win it all? I don’t want the same people that left out a 13-0 team to decide

1

Anonymous #3 12h

There are going to be people deciding who deserves to get in for a 24 team playoff too. The only way to get rid of that decision is by having a 138 team playoff. Does that sound ideal to you?

1