Anonymous #1 5w

“JMU is bad, they’ve only beaten 1 team with a winning record!!” 🤓 - fan of team that’s only beaten 1 opponent with a winning record

2

Anonymous #1 5w

UNT ain’t boatracing anyone lmfao

5

Anonymous OP 5w

Exactly bruh, and USF doesn’t even look so hot anymore. Best win is UNT, whose best win is?…

6

Anonymous #1 5w

Commented this on another post but I’m not a JMU student, I just think arguing about strength of schedule for G5 teams is utterly pointless and stupid. They all have shitty schedules, just put in the one with the best record.

3

Anonymous #2 5w

Currently Navy whose best win is…well it’s the American conference cycle of hell let’s be real

5

Anonymous #3 5w

One could argue that since they all beat up on each other, none of them are any good, and thus, not playoff quality

4

Anonymous #2 5w

it’s hard to tell cause of the G5/P4 structure. It’s as if there’s really 4 divisions of college ball rather than 3. We need to either act like the G5 is a separate division and treat it as such, or realign every single conference for better parity. Both of which aren’t gonna happen

1

Anonymous #3 5w

edit, 5 divisions vs 4, forgot about FCS

1

Anonymous #3 5w

I wouldn’t hate a G5 national champion that was crowned based on record/quality of bowl win

1

Anonymous #2 5w

I’d be in favor of a G5 natty if we treated the divisions like European football and relegated teams

1

Anonymous #2 5w

We all know the current playoff is a P4 playoff where they throw the G5 a bone for “fairness” but it’s not. It’s all a money game, and the teams that do well should be rewarded and those who can’t hang in their own P4 conference should have a consequence.

1

Anonymous #3 5w

I like this idea but I think the issue comes in when you factor in other sports, making a school change conferences for all sports, just because of the performance (or lack-thereof) of the football team wouldn’t make sense

6