Anonymous OP 1w

washington also a little high

2

Anonymous #1 1w

i mean missouris only losses are to #4 and #16 and tennessee lost to 3 ranked teams but i can see why you’d have tennessee out

13

Anonymous #2 1w

I mean tbh i don’t hate it, 20 a bit high but i like them ranked

9

Anonymous OP 1w

Swap with Washington imo

1

Anonymous #2 1w

A&M will roll, but I agree, they probably beat Vandy with Pribula healthy

1

Anonymous #2 1w

20 for washington is a bit too high too, things will play out tho these next few weeks we just started conference play only like 3 weeks ago

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I mean I don’t see a single power 4 team that should be ahead of them, but I would have Memphis and North Texas ranked.

0

Anonymous #8 1w

Memphis has 0 ranked wins and lost to UAB, UNT isn’t even the second G5 team to rank, USF is. CFP committee got 95% of the top 25 correct

0

Anonymous OP 1w

Most of the teams ranked from 21-25 have zero ranked wins. And there are plenty that also have a bad loss.

0

Anonymous #8 1w

Ole Miss has one ranked win and probably zero because Oklahoma will be unranked soon. They barely beat garbage teams by one scores: Arkansas, Kentucky, Washington state etc

3

Anonymous #8 1w

yeah but those teams have ranked losses and higher quality wins playing in harder conferences, it doesn’t matter tho

3

Anonymous #8 1w

cuz memphis and USF control their own destiny’s right now, win out and they get the G5 spot, UNT only needs to win out and hope either memphis or USF drop another regular season game to get the G5 spot

2

Anonymous OP 1w

Didn’t realize about the tie breaker but rn I think Memphis and north Texas are playing better than usf.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

USF played one bad fourth quarter relax, they choked the lead against memphis but realistically is the better team, they just got comfortable. and USF beat North Texas by 30 points 3 weeks ago😭😭

1

Anonymous #6 1w

Ok they will still finish 11-1 or 10-2.

1

Anonymous #10 1w

my only thought at this time

1

Anonymous #6 1w

I think A&M will knock Texas out and Bama will knock OU out. A&M, Bama, Georgia and Ole miss get in

15

Anonymous OP 1w

The problem is we know the pecking order and it’d be useless just to including all 4 when you know the pecking order. (1) sec champion (am or bama) (2) sec loser (am or bama) (3) georgia (bama beat goeriga) (4) ole miss (Georgia beat ole miss)

2

Anonymous OP 1w

Great lets just hate on every 2 loss big 10 team while ignoring the 2 loss sec teams

1

Anonymous #13 1w

the 2 loss SEC teams have quality wins while the Big 10 teams don’t

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Funny how the sec teams beat up on each other and avoid scrutiny but the big 10 teams do the same and dont get the respect

1

Anonymous OP 1w

I mean texas cant beat osu, and i know a team that can.z

1

Anonymous #13 1w

i mean i’m with you to a certain extent but there’s a gap between the wins, like washington and iowa have 0 ranked wins

1

Anonymous OP 1w

They got great losses though, just like ole miss. I mean name an ole miss quality win

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Ik miss has one loss but they also got to play ou when ou was down while michigan had to play healthy Mateer

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Oklahoma

1

Anonymous #13 1w

OU and LSU a solid win, also went neck and neck with georgia

1

Anonymous OP 1w

LSU is not a solid win, maybe ou counts. And iowa went neck and neck with IU who is clearly better than uga this year

1

Anonymous OP 1w

LSU and clemson were always bad i believe. Same with fsu

1

Anonymous #13 1w

He was going to come back the ole Miss game no matter what. He also said himself that his had wasn’t bothering him in that game like how it was against Texas

1

Anonymous #8 1w

From the film its clear that their offense wasnt at peak efficiency. But even if it was, is the gap between miss and iowa really 14 spots? I mean oregons only favored by 6 this week

1

Anonymous #13 1w

LSU lost to 2 top 7 teams and a top 20 team and is 5-3 that is the definition of a solid win and not a good win

1

Anonymous OP 1w

They struggled with the eye test all of september mate. Not a good team. Theres nuance to this stuff, not just “good wins” and “good losses”

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Every team has weeks where they aren’t playing good and I think Iowa is by far the worst of the current two loss big 10 teams so yeah that gap is definitely deserved and probably should be bigger cause mich clears Iowa

1

Anonymous #13 1w

i said they weren’t , solid wins consist of teams right above .500 that have losses to really good teams

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Usc is the team that really should be higher, they are borderline top 10 in the advanced metrics

1

Anonymous #13 1w

I mean rn I wouldn’t move them up but I would move Mich to 20 Washington to 21 and Iowa and Missouri at 22 and 23

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Mich being the highest of those makes sense. I agree texas and nd are the best 2 loss teams but theres really no need to move the big 10 cluster down

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Oh i do not think Notre dame should be in the top 10

1

Anonymous #8 1w

I mean texas should be above them but really nothing wrong with nd there. At least basing things on the whole year and not just one game in week 1

1

Anonymous #8 1w

ND should be moving down with Miami if we being real

4

Anonymous OP 1w

Nah nd is too high in the metrics to be moved down

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Yes

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Are you using metrics or eye test.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Like fpi and sp+

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Along with the eye test, which nd is passing rn

1

Anonymous #13 1w

ND is the same team they were in week 1 and week 3 the only difference is they aren’t playing teams that have a chance to make the playoff

1

Anonymous #13 1w

ND eye test look better than week 1, but with that logic winning games means nothing anymore, as long as you look good in the future ur good, which quite honestly is ruining football

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Well a 1 point loss to the 3rd team is playoff worthy

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Nah, theres a balance. If they were 3-5 i wouldnt have the same sentiment

1

Anonymous #8 1w

ND was en route to being blown out by Miami and the refs kept them in it giving them a TD to go down 7 handing them momentum into the 4th quarter eventually tying the game, it really should’ve been 28-7 Miami with the ball in the late third

1

Anonymous OP 1w

Didn’t know that about that game but going by scores and stats the only thing that has looked different has been the level of opponents

1

Anonymous #8 1w

ND is winning by more than Miami on average though, and in a way they are both acc teams

1

Anonymous #13 1w

ND just beat the worst team in the acc by 15 points and probably second worst team in the p4.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Yea but thats one game and their heart wasnt in it. Its not a georgia scenario where they are genuinely hanging from a cliff every week

1

Anonymous #13 1w

to be fair georgia has always been hanging from a cliff every week but they always stay in or win those big games vs bama, tennessee, LSU etc.

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Georgia also beat the top 10 team they played at home

1

Anonymous #8 1w

And they looked like dogshit in that game, in fact miss has looked better in the rest of the season than uga

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Uga needs to stop only showing up when they want to. This is becoming a bit of a trend, dating back to last year’s 1 point win over UK

1

Anonymous #13 1w

If they looked like dog shit in a game they won what does that say about Notre dame in the same situation.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Nuance buddy, nuance. You cant just look at wins and losses. And you cant single out one game. All eight games matter

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Ok than let’s use what you said about Georgia in the ole Miss game that they played like shit and look at nd full schedule. It goes week 1: shit bye week 3: shit week 4: good offense bad defense week 5: elite week 6: solid week 7: elite week 8: great week 9: disappointing.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Losing to a&m by 1 is not shit dude. All losses are not shit just because they’re losses

1

Anonymous #13 1w

You called an 8 point win against a top 10 team shit

1

Anonymous #8 1w

And last 4 weeks are obv the most important

1

Anonymous #13 1w

I’m using your logic

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Because uga has an insane home field advantage and ole miss led almost the whole game. Oregons win over osu last year wasnt that good either

1

Anonymous #8 1w

ND actually doesnt have a huge home field advantage, i think uga proved that in 2017 with all the red

1

Anonymous #13 1w

You are not using a week 1 or 2 game the year after a 4-8 season and comparing it to coming off a national championship loss

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Nd was ranked higher 😭

1

Anonymous #8 1w

19 vs 24 lmao it shouldve been all white and green

1

Anonymous #13 1w

I don’t see how that matters at all you still have to get students excited to come watch them and them sucking the year before isn’t gonna make students go. Also you are acting like it was ucla taking over the stadium.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Cus it kinda was lmao, and also im not putting everything into ugas win over ole miss, because it was their best win of the season. What about auburn florida and austin peay

1

Anonymous #13 1w

Sounds like to you anyway week 2 results don’t matter so that clears the Austin peay game. And than the Auburn game is a lot like the Boise state game for nd they struggled in the first half and than shut them down in the second. Than they sucked against Florida and should have lost but Florida had bad play calling and beat them self.

1

Anonymous #8 1w

Dude they barely beat auburn, like it was close

1

Anonymous #13 1w

They allowed 50 yards in the second half and won by two scores

1