Anonymous #2 1d

Using AI to depict things that look hyper realistic is a form of violating consent

1

Anonymous #2 1d

A boomer would be too stupid to tell that the video is fake. I’m arguing that it should never have been made

1

Anonymous OP 1d

Is there case law behind that ?

-2

Anonymous #2 1d

I’m sorry but maybe common sense should prevail and we should respect people instead of depicting horrible things happening to them

1

Anonymous OP 1d

that post was asking if people were overreacting about arch manning laughing. The question wasn’t about the video itself

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

It’s an argument in favor of the fact that maybe the hatred towards that video is warranted to the point where we should be questioning why it was made in the first place

3

Anonymous OP 1d

Nope. If arch manning wasn’t involved people would have scrolled past and ignored the video

-2

Anonymous OP 1d

You went from stating it as if it was law to making a suggestion

-1

Anonymous #2 1d

Consent isn’t always a legal thing

5

Anonymous #2 1d

The video should have never been allowed to have been made. Giving it this publicity is a problem, but not THE problem

1

Anonymous #2 21h

All AI is trained on real videos and pictures of the things they are trying to emulate

1