Anonymous #1 4w

nah we could stand to lose him. oxford needs a purge of the bandwagoners. or, we continue to be a good program. i am content either way

6

Anonymous OP 4w

He’s 95% of recruiting for ole miss. Lose him you lose most of your team and all ability to get new guys. Ole miss will be a middle of the row sec team at best without him

1

Anonymous #1 4w

right, i just said i don’t like the bandwagoners in oxford. too many people are at the school right now. i’d be okay not having an overcrowded school. i’d also love to see us stay successful. i understand both can’t coexist, so i am content with either having a losing team but better environment or keeping the overcrowdedness but we are a winning program

1

and it worked didn’t it?

1

you gotta understand that within the span of 6 years, the school has grown by thousands (which it cannot support infrastructure wise). to stay in a hotel during a game weekend is hundreds of dollars and has to be reserved months and months in advance. it ruins the spirit of the school. i like my school doing well in football, but that’s rarely been an aspect of the university. i’d rather be able to visit my friends and watch us lose than be kicked out by people who never heard of us before kiff

1

fr! it’s tough to effectively root against the school, but it loses the charm which is a catch 22–football gets better, which in turns makes it hard to watch (in a different way to when your team is just bad lol). our joke was always that we never lost a party. would rather have the party Tbh

1