Anonymous #2 4d

h2h and whatnot

12

Anonymous OP 3d

Buddy only likes sec teams. Osu -8 or 9 vs a&m and im layin em

10

Anonymous #4 3d

Lmao ok. Beating Mizzou by only 3 is outrageous, also getting outgained by tennessee

-3

Anonymous #3 3d

💋🌹💥

1

Anonymous #7 3d

“Miss the glory days when you could pencil bama or Georgia in the finals.” Thats so lame though for anyone who’s not a bama/georgia fan

28

Anonymous #10 3d

You used to be able to pencil in bama clemson osu and ou. Now its just osu

10

Anonymous #8 3d

OU was like 20 years ago. OSU has been good but not dominating. Actually I think it’s better when you have dominating teams. More hype when your team plays. Means more if your team wins. Means more when they lose. Having garbage teams week in and week out compete with top teams, are top teams even top? Auburn and MS state could easily be undefeated

5

Anonymous #7 3d

I agree. Georgia and Bama just look depressing, its hard to see people continue to glaze them when something is clearly missing

13

Anonymous #7 3d

There are no great teams in the sec anymore

3

Anonymous #8 3d

No idea how you pulled that from my takes 😂 I would maybe believe that if Ohio State proved themselves but their schedule is so puss

31

Anonymous #8 3d

Mizzou was also a huge threat until their starters got hurt 2 weeks ago

28

Anonymous OP 3d

Sec fans care more about who you play than how you play

14

Anonymous OP 3d

“Osu hasnt played anyone” ❌ “Osu has been concealing their playbook and once they start trying they will blow everyone out” ✅

-14

Anonymous #8 3d

i-

1

Anonymous #8 3d

They are 50% of the top 12 cfb playoff rankings💀

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Yea and none of them are good. 2023 michigan was the last legit football team built from the ground up. All this pay for play shit aint gonna work and sec fans will soon see that

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Even when ole miss obviously bought 2 wins over bama they lost immediately following that game. Cant hold a top 5 rank for more than a week lmao. Buying doesnt work

1

Anonymous #8 3d

SEC jealousy is a disease

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Not jealousy, i will be upset when an sec team inevitable loses by 20 to osu and everyone turns the tv off

1

Anonymous #8 3d

OSU is on Notre Dame watch until proven otherwise and that’s just indisputable

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Two best teams maybe

1

Anonymous #8 3d

With the easiest schedules of course

1

Anonymous OP 3d

SOS =\ quality

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Until proven otherwise yes

1

Anonymous OP 3d

They’ve proven otherwise. Lemme introduce you to opponent adjusted analytics

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Unfortunately OSU has not

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Too bad, they #1 in everything except SOS, because SOS isnt a real stat

1

Anonymous #8 3d

If Notre Dame has proven themselves more thru their schedule either it’s a terrible conference issue or extremely weak schedule issue or BOTH. In this case for OSU it’s both💀

1

Anonymous OP 3d

You didnt read the part about opponent adjusted didnt you

1

Anonymous OP 3d

The Goergia fans have plagued your mind with all this SOS shit. Nothing is more overrated as a concept than SOS

1

Anonymous #8 3d

I read it and then i cleared that

1

Anonymous #8 3d

In no universe do i fw Georgia

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Because your brain aint on that level ig 😭

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Got a perfect bracket last year by using the metrics

1

Anonymous #8 3d

No it was just that easy to refute 💀

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Clearly didn’t use the winning money for tuition based on your intellectual performance thus far

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Im not strictly talking about their resume, I'm just saying there's not other team in this graphic that I'd pick against them at a neutral site. Except maybe OSU

2

Anonymous OP 3d

I dont think they guy discrediting the math should be talking about intellectual performance

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Same guy who would try and argue FPI rankings are more credible than AP or CFP

1

Anonymous OP 3d

They are though. An AP voter moved Florida up after losing to a G5

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Clocked that shi huh lmfaoooo

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Calling the AP credible in any way is embarrassing

1

Anonymous OP 3d

No, you didnt clock shit

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Your cockiness is insane

1

Anonymous OP 3d

More credible ≠ ultimately credible when being compared bozo

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Easy to come off that way when i’m arguing with a cattle brained bot

1

Anonymous OP 3d

FPI uses math, AP doesnt use any logic because they dont watch the games

1

Anonymous #8 3d

“ No logic” just like your arguments so far but anywho

1

Anonymous OP 3d

No logic because you and I watch more football than the average AP voter. Stop trolling, you know the AP is a load of shit

1

Anonymous #8 3d

AP is not awesome but it is better than FPI by far, mind you FPI had unranked Texas at #7 just a few weeks ago😭

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Because they are around #7, notice how they are 10th now? FPI is PREDICTIVE. You dont get the point of the metric

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Theres no way you just said this. You just admitted that the FPI is good at its job

1

Anonymous #8 3d

And notice how that’s the specific team that has everyone in uprage being that high currently, they’re shit. Wrong again lmfao

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Nope. FPI is great at its job as it can correctly predict team quality

1

Anonymous OP 3d

ND should be higher. FPI is right about them too

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Rage bait

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Nice try chud

1

Anonymous OP 3d

What bait?

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Calling me “chud” doesnt help you win the argument

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Arguments been well over and won we established that

1

Anonymous OP 3d

W gaslight

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Broke phone service just now catching up i see, i’ll give u a min

1

Anonymous #8 3d

Cheers mate, hopefully you took some notes from this ✌🏼

1

Anonymous OP 3d

Texas (10) beat OU (11) and Vandy (13). Lost to Ohio State (1) and Florida (unranked) and they all have the same W-L record. They’re exactly where they should be unless you believe OU and Vandy should also drop farther back, which isn’t a bad “the SEC is overrated argument”, but ppl keep complaining about TX and never mention OU or Vandy. But they’ll likely lose to Georgia (5) this week so who knows how they’ll tank versus Vandy and Oklahoma after that happens.

5

Anonymous #2 3d

Same answer I gave above. Texas (10) beat OU (11) and Vandy (13). Lost to Ohio State (1) and Florida (unranked) and they all have the same W-L record. They’re exactly where they should be unless you believe OU and Vandy should also drop farther back, which isn’t a bad “the SEC is overrated argument”, but ppl keep complaining about TX and never mention OU or Vandy. But they’ll likely lose to Georgia (5) this week so who knows how they’ll tank versus Vandy and Oklahoma after that happens.

5

Anonymous #14 3d

The loss to Florida should factor in more.

2

Anonymous #8 3d

Why not try now

1

Anonymous #8 2d

Indiana +20 vs OSU

1

Anonymous #12 2d

Which is fine but they proved on the field to be better than OU and Vandy and all 3 have the same record. So OU and Vandy should also drop farther back.

1

Anonymous #12 2d

Oh and also if we’re creating a standard where cherry picked losses mean more than why aren’t people complaining that Bama should drop more since they lost to Florida State.

1

Anonymous #14 2d

because tx sucks ass and got lucky those games. OU would’ve beaten them easily if their qb was healthy

0

Anonymous #14 2d

Bama Georgia and ole Miss are all at one loss. Bama beat Georgia and Georgia beat ole Miss. strength of schedule is in that order also. The problem isn’t the order the problem is where do you insert this string. It seems like record is most important then head to head.

1

Anonymous #7 2d

I agree but people keep saying “why is Texas ranked 10” and the answer is actually really simple, it’s because OU is ranked 11th and Vandy 13th. Then someone says “the loss to Florida should hurt Texas more” and all I’m saying is that cherry picking losses can become arbitrary if it’s not applied equally across the board.

1