Anonymous #2 12w

What was that?

5

Anonymous #2 12w

And what great delusion it is!

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Yeah, I don’t think that would’ve made a difference. Ouch.

0

Anonymous #6 12w

You don’t think UNC’s top leading scorers would’ve made a difference?

-1

Anonymous #4 12w

It was 24 points lil bro

5

Anonymous OP 12w

Caleb Wilson on his own averages 20 ppg lil bro 😂

-1

Anonymous #4 12w

Yeah, put him and Veesaar in, subtract the points by their replacements, and you still don’t make up 24 points.

0

Anonymous #6 12w

If zayden high could outplay your front court imagine the damage veesaar and Wilson would do

-1

Anonymous #4 12w

Too bad you didn’t have any guards for this hypothetical that wouldn’t brick threes

0

Anonymous #6 12w

Guards wouldn’t take 33 3s if they were playing genius

-1

Anonymous #4 12w

Probably shouldn’t have last night anyways, especially if your sex offender was so good.

0

Anonymous #6 12w

Your team let him drop a double double 😂 he’s not good

0

Anonymous #4 12w

Surely you kept it within 20, right?

0

Anonymous #6 12w

You’re the one hanging a banner for a meaningless win 2 starters down not me

0

Anonymous #6 12w

Nothing to cope about, the loss was so meaningless it didn’t even drop UNC’s seed line, but congrats on your 8th win in 23 years!

1

Anonymous #4 12w

I see it’s hitting your system good!

1

Anonymous #4 12w

“Nothing to cope about” proceeds to do the definition of coping

4

Anonymous OP 12w

Where’s the coping? I’m congratulating you on your big “statement” win! I know you don’t get to see them very often

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Like you don’t see ACC titles often?

1

Anonymous #4 12w

You think there was a reason we didn’t rush the court? I was a student sitting front row sideline and we didn’t rush because, while it was a big win point differential wise, it wasn’t a big win because the competition was so lackluster

4

Anonymous #6 12w

We hang banners for nattys but yall gotta fill up those empty rafters somehow so I get why you like to count ACC titles

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Keep coping pal. What does that have to do with the 24 point loss you endured last night?

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Yeah and why was the competition so lackluster? Because UNC was missing 46% of their scoring and 42% of their rebounding… you’re proving my point that it’s an asterisk win.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

What do ACC titles have to do with anything? You brought that shit up first

1

Anonymous #4 12w

An unbalanced team is a sign of a bad team. Our best player went out with a busted open head for half the game and our lead grew by 10 points.

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Yeah I’m so sure a team like Duke wouldn’t struggle against teams with no boozer or ngongba

1

Anonymous #4 12w

I bet they would play better than that sorry ass attempt at a game

1

Anonymous #4 12w

UNC actually did used to hang banners for ACC titles, back when they won them.

4

Anonymous #6 12w

Just won a title in 2024 btw

1

Anonymous #4 12w

For more information, Google “2024 ACC champions”

1

Anonymous #6 12w

We aren’t talking about ACC champions, we’re talking about titles, of which there are two, but nice attempt at moving the goal posts!

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Ay man congrats, but all I’m hearing is cope about last nights game.

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Ok, whatever makes you feel good, it’s still been a decade since you won it

1

Anonymous #6 12w

It’s been over 40 years since you’ve made a title game

1

Anonymous OP 12w

Again no coping! Congrats on your win*!

1

Lmfaooo you lost to Georgia tech at home

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Coping in that very same comment is beyond parody

4

Anonymous #6 12w

Not a cope when the selection committee will have the same asterisk next to that win

1

Anonymous #4 12w

Yeah, if it were decided by, like, five

1

Anonymous #4 12w

But speaking of the selection committee, I think it’s fine.

0

Anonymous #6 12w

No? When they look at a team sheet and see the score line there will 100% be something on there about veesaar and Wilson to devalue the quality. Metrics like NET, Kenpom, etc don’t factor in who plays in games so that actually means nothing

-2

Anonymous #4 12w

NET is literally the committee’s own tool. Not that I have to convince you though (I hope you’re not on the committee)

0

Anonymous #4 12w

The committees decisions about march madness seeding is a continuation of the NET rankings stupid

0

Anonymous #6 12w

Yeah so you have no idea what you’re talking about. The NET is an efficiency metrics calculator, it does not consider things like which players played and neither does Kenpom, doesn’t matter that the committee made it. So when they print out a team sheet they still list out each notable quad 1/2/3/4 wins and losses and the committee absolutely discusses extra context. You’re an idiot if you think the only thing the committee looks at is NET rankings regarding seeding and picking the field

-1

Anonymous OP 12w

It’s not, try again! The committee looks at all sorts of things including individual results, not just NET rankings, stupid. If that were the case why would we even need a selection committee your seed would just be your NET ranking

3