
this!!! i have crohn’s and once i was having some weird symptoms. everyone (and doctors) told me i was completely fine, drink more water, try miralax etc. turns out i had a bowel stricture for 6 months 😀 not seeing anything change, except the bags under my eyes growing and my face becoming gaunt, was insane, and i felt like i was losing it bc of an illness i couldn’t prove i had
It’s so funny to me because I have a genetic condition so like I know I’m not faking because I can’t fake a genetic test but I find myself feeling like I’m being really dramatic or it’s in my head when I’m feeling well and then I’ll have a day where my symptoms are really bad and it reminds me that no it’s not in my head 😭
I feel complicated about the visible vs invisible binary. I think mine would be an “invisible” disability but with the premature aging, sunken eyes, skin issues, slightly atypical gait & side effects from longterm dependence on immunosuppressants, it sure is “visible” enough for strangers to be ableist towards me
It’s effectively ableist because the differences are caused by your disability, but they aren’t intentionally being ableist. They’re mistreating you because you’re outside the beauty standard, not because they *know* you’re disabled. Similar w autism - we’re mistreated bcos we’re weird a lot, but not bcos they hate the disability explicitly. So you’re still not necessarily getting the help you need, but you are getting the hate
totally, I know they aren’t consciously registering me as a disabled person, it’s just frustrating to have people disrespect me over markers of illness and then be surprised when I say I’m disabled. I wish people would stay critical of their own judgments and think about *why* a person may “look weird” or w/e, you know
maybe I’m being overly pedantic for autism reasons but tbh in that case I don’t really understand why we keep using the term. I also worry there’s a baked-in presumption that people whose disability is *more* visible must be taken seriously and afforded more accommodations, when that’s def not always necessarily the case
I totally understand your stance. I usually use the term “invisible” because, unless I’m actively having an episode or flare up, people won’t be able to see my issues and expect me to be able to do things I cannot or judge me for faking illness. But I totally see the point that people with “visible” disabilities still face tons of discrimination. I feel like there is some difference in discrimination experience but the disabled community is so diverse and complex that these terms aren’t perfect
I also mean that like, when an ex of mine needed to use a cane they weren’t taken any more seriously based on that “visibility”. they still had doctors shrug them off, still weren’t offered a seat on the bus when it was so crowded they were forced to stand, still weren’t able to get on SSI without having to get a lawyer & go to trial over being denied. so that kind of opened my eyes re: the way being more-explicitly Visible doesn’t necessarily equate to being afforded more accommodation