Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
I didn’t think there was a “wrong” way to read a book until I learned that there are people that only read the dialogue????? And some people skip the prologue and epilogue???? Guys hello the -logues are important!!!!
upvote 80 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

my eyes just dart to the dialogue but then i go back and read the part i skipped 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 6w

eh, the dialogue usually gets the point of the book across and cuts out most of the filler anyway.

upvote -9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Have you ever read any McCarthy? Feel like it’d be a nightmare trying to determine what was dialogue and what wasn’t with his style if you just skim for it.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 6w

I’ve read most McCarthy and my strategy works out just fine.

upvote -4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

But what if the character is lying? What if they’re unreliable? What if their main conflict is self vs self? How would you grasp all of that from just the dialogue?

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

Trust me, I can tell just fine. It’s self-evident.

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

I think we can agree to disagree lol

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

Nah I know myself, you don’t know me unfortunately

upvote -3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Yeah that’s what I’m saying? We disagree on this matter and that’s fine bc I don’t know you

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

No I’m saying I won’t agree to disagree because you’re wrong as evidenced by you making claims about me despite never having met me besides through about 200 words on an online forum. Good day ma’am

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

lol okay

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 6w

that’s what I thought.

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

What kind of books do you read? I feel like they would have to be very dialogue heavy

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 6w

david foster wallape.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Damn if that’s how you read just read scripts instead. I understand skipping a bit of purple prose, but… don’t you want to read the book? Not to read 20% of it??? Like what’s the point if you skip every description, action scene, physical movement, or internal thought

upvote 7 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #5 6w

Most of what you just said is covered in dialogue.

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

You haven’t read McCarthy if you think you can just skim through dialogue lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

No one said I’m skimming through dialogue, I am very thorough. Lol

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

You’re skimming through the book by just reading dialogue, which is literally impossible with McCarthy btw

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

It’s too late for your argument, I already did.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

You clearly didn’t

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

I have at least 2 times.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

No you didn’t. you can’t “just read the dialogue” of McCarthy, he doesn’t use quotation marks, so there’s no marker telling you where dialogue starts or stops. You’d have to already be reading closely enough to identify it as dialogue, at which point you’re not skimming, you’re just reading the book. Stop lying lmao

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

No, I read closely enough to identify the dialogue, then skip the rest.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

No response. Surprise surprise. No one can deny my methods, lol.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Right, you just sense when the dialogue’s over. Just admit you didn’t read McCarthy dude, this works for literally any author but him 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

I literally just sense when the dialogue is over and continue scanning.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

🤣🤣

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

The larp would’ve worked if you chose any author but McCarthy, nice try tho bud

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

That’s why I’m so advanced — I can dialogue read the one author most people wouldn’t dare to try it on. Luckily for me, my balls are big.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Truly the bravest reading strategy known to man. History will remember this. A beacon of intelligence.

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

I applaud you for recognizing greatness when you see it, unlike these bickering half-wits who refuse to bow down to me despite my fantasmatic ways.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

I regret to inform you, in the same fantasmatic spirit you’ve so graciously bestowed upon us, that you remain, despite your skimming prowess, a little bitch.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

Once again, I’ve never skimmed, I selectively read thoroughly. I’m used to being hated for speaking the truth, however, I know my day will come. Let freedom ring.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Dress it up in whatever finery you please, the diagnosis is clear as day: you are unequivocally, a consummate, delusional, quintessential little bitch boy. Let freedom ring indeed.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 6w

Hating someone out of jealousy is completely natural, but it does, in fact, make you what you are accusing me of being, unfortunately. Hate to drop too many truth nuked on you but it appears you’ve been roasted.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

What exactly do you define as filler? I know it’s not the case with every book, but if you consider very artistically written books, then like—the non-dialogue is quite important to the experience as well? I’d be curious how you’d read Tolkien

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

I read Tolkien’s dialogue.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

So, let’s say during the chapter where the rohirrim ride to Gondor’s aid, the only part of that you read was Theoden’s speech?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

Haven’t gotten there yet.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Do you ever read any non-dialogue, or is it a strict adherence?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

Strict.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

God help you if you ever read a book that’s mostly exposition

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

If anything you’re the one getting exposed right now.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Huh? I paid for the whole book so I’m gonna read the whole book, and if the author put it in there, I want to know why, and experience it in that way. I can understand reading only the dialogue as an interesting alternative for a second read, but a dogmatic devotion to it is foreign

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

then why watch a movie?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

…do you think the only thing going on in a movie is the dialogue? Camera angle alone will determine the difference between a film nerd getting wet or throwing a brick at the screen

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

Who said I want to see a film nerd get wet? And who brings a brick to a theater?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Okay, you have no interest in an honest conversation. You’re picking apart semantic comparisons and trying to bait me with annoyance into continuing this. Good day.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

Saying you want to read the whole book because you paid for it is like saying you want to eat the whole cherry because you paid for it. You’re gonna have a bad time chewing on the pit.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You’re honestly gonna bait me & not reply? loser.

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

A cherry was made for the pit to be spit out. Something like an apple? You can eat the whole thing. Authors make books to be read in their entirety, otherwise they wouldn’t have bothered to write all of it.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Oh no, I am doing other things than arguing online, how insufferable

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You’re literally not lmao holy shit 🤣🤣🤣🤣

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

I’m tired of this, book club doesn’t need negativity, peace

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You’re the one being negative, i was positively describing my abilities and hear you are trying to bring me down and doubt my ways. Good riddence.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Okay, then how exactly was I “exposing” myself previously? How am I a loser for taking 3 minutes to reply to a comment on Yikyak? It is my view that you’re disrespecting authors, but I don’t believe I’ve called you any unfriendly name in this conversation. I am tired, I would like to rest and enjoy the rest of my day. Have a good one.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You’re seriously asking me how you’re a loser for getting in a fight on yikyak?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You called me a “film nerd”

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

If you have such little media literacy to think that I called you in particular a film nerd, then I am unsurprised you believe the dialogue alone is a superior experience to a full book. And truly, replying twice to my one message does make you look a bit desperate for attention.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 6w

Be honest are you ragebaiting ppl? lmao. Also, are David Wallace’s books good? I’ve heard of Infinite Jest but never read it

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #7 6w

You’re being trolled my man

upvote 1 downvote