
It is porn, but admittedly (and this frustration isn’t directed at you op) I’m annoyed with the people who think it’s JUST porn. That also exists, but most books have a good chunk of plot too. I’ve got a patty on my cheeseburger, but there’s also the rest of the sandwich that I enjoy. I don’t just wanna eat ground beef
it definitely is porn but i feel like it's usually different than visual porn. the industry and atmosphere of visual porn is harmful and gives people who watch it unrealistic expectations about what to expect during sex. it dehumanizes the women involved and strips the characters in it of any real identity. a lot of it also glorifies harmful fetishes or stereotypes. whereas "smut" has at least some form of plot or at least gives you an insider on the character's emotions to humanize them.
The main issue with it is that if someone says a boon is porn, they believe every page is descriptions of dicks and choking and such. No, most of these books are deep involved stories with amazing plots and then there’s a chapter where they have sex and then the rest of the story continues. Unless you’re going out of your way to find a couple specific books that are just sex every chapter, it’s a smut books. It is a form of sexually explicit material but mainstream porn is very different
Remind me why we care? I understand your point, but it’s still reading and this conversation from its origin has been used as a way to negate women’s reading. Smut is just the term to classify books that contain that material, but contain does not mean it makes up the entire book. I don’t understand why we have to keep having this conversation when there’s no reason for it.
It doesn’t negate women’s reading 🙄 I have exactly TWO books in my personal possession that are pornographic. The other 300+ have zero explicit sex scenes or no sex at all. And if you want to read porn then go for it. You looking down on it is your own problem. Also I never said it was the entire book. This is a book community so please at least learn to read before coming here😅
Please reread my comment. Advocates of book banning label any book under the sun as pornographic so that they can remove books they don’t like from school libraries. Hence why I don’t like to use the term ‘pornographic’ to refer to books, because it’s been hijacked and has a new meaning now.
Brazzers is not the only type of porno movies out there. Also the clips that get put on pornhub of pretty much any movie are only quick clips of plot (if any) then straight into the sex. The best example of this is hentai. There are hentai shows with full seasons and actual plots and out of every 20-30 min episode maybe 4 minutes will be sex. It’s still porn.
Movie porn is focused on the male gaze which can be a lot mor problematic because it can be absolutely anything like CP or nonconsentual. Book “porn” is more in depth and has a buildup which is actually what many women prefer and it’s focused on the female gaze which is more about being loved and cared for while the movies can be more violent and are just meant to be a quick jerk and they’re done
It’s definitely a sub genre but it’s a lot less sexual content compared to movie porn the smut I read is like 3-4 chapters out of like 30 are actually full sex scenes anything else is a bit of staring at each other or a 1 page long buildup and kiss. Yes there are some books that are more focused on that but I feel like smut is more diverse than people are making it out to be and I usually skim any sex I come across because I don’t want to read about the sex I want the cute and loving moments
Okay okay what if we eradicate how the visual porn industry currently is and rebuild it. This time visual porn being a lot similar to smut. The only reason why online visual porn is the way it is- is because the way the patriarchy has taught men to view sex is really fucked up. We dismantle the patriarchy, redefine porn and have amazing solo sex and even better partnered sex. It will only take about 50 years but we just gotta lock in.
Most if not all visual porn dehumanizes the woman. And that’s the problem here. The Patriarchal sexual experience is all about getting off on having power over someone instead of mutually engaging in an act. That’s why CP is so prevalent and mostly why rape happens. Look I’m not here to yuck bitches yums but there is no way you’re gonna sit here and tell me that visual porn is a better representation of sex compared to smutt because then ima just assume that you’re a man who can’t read….
Fair enough, though I’d argue that those women with those Kinks are dealing with some fucked up shit that should be addressed. But I’d also argue CNC is still consensual… but that debate is similar to the “is water wet” debate. I’d also say that written Kinky sex is a lot less common than visual kinky sex but I could be wrong. Do I personally think I should be the ultimate supreme morality arbiter. (Duh) but we are both adults and we know the difference between good and bad.
These types of discussion are difficult, because there is the obvious question of “where do we draw the line”, and I do admit my first comment in this thread-I was kind of joking (kind of not), but I was just personally saying that I think visual porn would be a lot better if it was similar to MOST written smut. Just saying… 🤷🏾♀️ how about we try it and you can listen to me say I told you so in 50 years 😉