
- Despite training to be a scribe for her entire life and having significantly less physical training than everyone else, she very quickly becomes the best fighter and bests everyone at sparring. Given, she sort of games the system at first as a workaround for her physical limitations. But it doesn't matter! It turns out that she doesn't need to "cheat" because even when she isn't poisoning people she ends up being the best fighter anyway.
- The constant exposition is incredibly annoying and clumsy. Even more so because Violet has a "coping mechanism" where she just... recites political knowledge and history word-for-word out loud. I mean, I guess maybe someone out there in the world recites the Constitution aloud to calm their anxiety?
- All of the secondary characters feel like accessories to Violet. Like all of them. Every other character exists only to be a trope/archetype. Every other character exists only to be something to Violet, whether that be her love interest, her bully, her bff, her third wheel in the love triangle, soon-to-be-dead guy, etc. etc.
- The narrative is constantly validating Violet at every turn. Violet is always right– and if she isn't she somehow is anyway. Anyone who is mean to her, disagrees with her, or gets in her way is shortly thereafter neutralized, completely dominated/humiliated by her, or just straight up *dies*. Basically, anyone who isn't Team Violet gets punished by the narrative.
- This very much reads as a power fantasy, which isn't to say there's anything wrong with power fantasies. Power fantasies can be fun! It's just that this book is also DESPERATELY trying to convince me that there are high stakes, like asoiaf/got type stakes, at every turn– and I'm not buying it!!!!!
- I won't say Violet never struggles or faces challenges because she does, but her struggles are all pretty... inconsequential? Like, she gets injured pretty often, but it's mentioned, forgotten about for a page or two, and then quickly resolved anyway. Also, she experiences trauma, but never really metabolizes it. A rando character will die, and she will lament about the cruelty and callousness of their culture/school, but within the next paragraph starts talking about how hot Xaden is.
I love the book and agree with the majority of your points. I can see where there are things here and there that could be debatable (mostly because some of the side character’s are able to get more of a title than violets bff in later books). I think it’s fun, but you can definitely tell she’s trying to learn how to write fantasy
- She has a special powerful mom, a special powerful sister, a special powerful (dead) brother, a special dark rebel love interest with one of the most powerful abilities and dragons, TWO special dragons (also she's the *first* rider *ever* to have two dragons), and those two dragons treat her differently than other dragons would treat their riders. She has special super rare and unheard of time-freezing powers, another super special rare storm ability, special hair, special eyes.
- Look, I realize that's sort of the purpose of characters. Secondary characters exist to push the story forward and sometimes only exist in proximity to the main character. Not every character needs depth or an independent arc or to be more than what they are. But come on, man. These don't feel like actual people. They stop existing the second Violet isn't there to see them.
As a side note, this was so funny to read because of the irony. Someone just died and she's like "I can't believe everyone moves on so quickly" and *immediately* moves on to think about how hot Xaden is with no other transition. I want to think that the author is doing that intentionally for the irony, but I have so little faith in the writing that I'm 97% sure that isn't the case.
For sure! I actually did find the book entertaining and fun in my own way. Writing a book is difficult, and I didn’t go into Fourth Wing expecting it to be my cup of tea. I read it knowing I probably wouldn’t like it, partly because I find value in reading books I don’t like and articulating why. It helps me with my own writing. That said, I think a well-written book should be able to stand on its own. My critique is based solely on the content of the first book, which is what I read.
Yeah! I don’t think it’s very productive to call a piece of art or media stupid and label that a critique. There’s also nothing wrong with people enjoying the series. Not everything needs to be That Deep. I was entertained reading the book in my own way, and I genuinely appreciate the creativity and art the fandom has produced.