Anonymous #1 2w

nah that’s fair… but think of the ORB my friend, think of the Orb! Tbf Taiwan actually pays for their stockpile at least too for the most part.

7

Anonymous #2 1w

Tourism for one Then the engineering and logistical progress needed to both make such a massive orb without surface imperfections and rooting the orb to the base of the San Francisco Bay without it sinking and altering tidal patterns. Pagan rituals

1

Anonymous #3 1w

The orb would ruin the view of the San Francisco coast and horizon and potentially disturb ship travel. You could use those funds to build something more aesthetically appealing than an obsidian orb. Also not sure how the engineering and logistics will bring economic benefit rather than loss.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

Well, it’s a massive orb over 2km in height. Just building it would be an engineering challenge. Also, I know it’s the bay, but who else would have a giant orb… Also you didn’t dispute the rituals element.

1

Anonymous #3 1w

The orb will probably attract tourists at first but will most likely loose traction because it’s not a historic site or aesthetically appealing, especially in comparison to the other things that SF offers. SF might lose tourists bc ppl visit SF to see the GG bridge and the islands and the orb will ruin the view. Are you saying that because it’s an “engineering challenge”, it will create more jobs for people? If so, any other project that’s not an orb will create jobs as well.

1

Anonymous #2 1w

It’s certainly a more worthwhile challenge than sending that money to Ratheon to make more missiles to bomb weddings in Yemen with. I also never said that the orbs benefits outweighed the downsides, just that there were benefits.

1