Anonymous #1 10h

acting like those jobs require a dick to work

33

Anonymous #1 10h

the post was about men not jobs that woman have..

23

Gonna go out on a limb here and assume this is about all the recent news and the general feeling most women have these days that men are out to get them (which to be fair some are) and are just too much trouble to deal with and not about men and their overwhelming good contribution to society.

11

Anonymous #1 9h

All I’m reading is: things women already do, things women already do, things women already do This post mainly refers to the violence and oppression that exist in this world at the hands of men. 95% of violent crime is committed by who? Men. Imagine a matriarchal world instead of a patriarchal one. Problems would never be zero but they would be pretty damn close.

22

Anonymous #1 9h

And I do NOT want to hear another “not all men” rebuttal. We already know it’s not all men, but it’s clearly enough men to be fed up to the point of imagining a world if they were gone.

15

Anonymous #1 9h

Every person alive is the product of both sexes, and every functioning society depends on contributions from both. You can acknowledge the very real problem of male violence without turning half of humanity into something disposable. Men need women, women need men, and society would be devastated by the disappearance of either

-7

Anonymous #1 9h

entirely ignoring the actual sentiment of the post by arguing ad hoc.

17

Anonymous #2 8h

You can take male violence seriously without treating men collectively as disposable

-7

Anonymous #1 8h

still completely missing the sentiment of the post but ok

12

Anonymous #2 8h

What exactly am I missing? If the sentiment is opposition to male violence, then say “a world without male violence.” The post celebrates a world without men. Conflating men themselves with male violence is exactly what I’m criticizing.

-4

Anonymous #2 8h

Would you like to be a sanitation worker?

-8

Anonymous #2 8h

Nobody said women are incapable of these jobs. I’m pointing out that men currently do the overwhelming majority of them. “Women could do it” doesn’t make the existing workforce disposable

-5

Anonymous #1 8h

if it pays well idgaf. acting like women are too feminine and weak to do sanitation work is incredibly misogynistic and shows you’re a man invading this space, as if that wasn’t obvious already. gtfo.

17

Anonymous #1 8h

ad hoc argument because you refuse to address the sentiment. if you keep repeating the same shit then so will I lmao

9

Anonymous #1 8h

“conflating men with male violence” this made me giggle, you are fully trolling 💀

12

Anonymous #2 8h

“Ad hoc” is not a synonym for “irrelevant.” If you think I’m missing the point, the term you’re looking for might be “red herring” or “non sequitur.” An ad hoc argument is a claim introduced specifically to protect another claim from contrary evidence. Repeating the term doesn’t change its definition.

-6

Anonymous #2 8h

Women commit the large majority of infanticides of newborns. Would “imagine how wonderful life would be if women ceased to exist” therefore be a reasonable response to infanticide? Obviously not. A disparity in harmful behavior doesn’t make the entire sex synonymous with that behavior.

-1

Anonymous #1 8h

you’re right, a more appropriate term would be “making up shit to get mad at.” because that’s what you’ve done this whole time.

16

Anonymous #1 6h

There’s literally women in all of these jobs and there would be more in some of them if they weren’t such misogynistic environments.

6

Anonymous #1 6h

13% of US sanitation workers already are women. In Dalberg it’s 50%.

11

Anonymous #5 6h

If 95% of a workforce disappears overnight, pointing out that the remaining 5% are capable workers doesn’t solve the 95% labor shortage

-1

Anonymous #5 6h

If 87% of sanitation workers disappeared overnight, the existence of the remaining 13% wouldn’t make the labor shortage disappear

-3

Anonymous #5 6h

Even if it were 50/50 nationally. Half of sanitation workers gone? That would be pretty catastrophic

0

Anonymous OP 6h

You can recognize that men disproportionately commit violent crime without reducing society’s problems to “men.” Collective blame based on sex isn’t a serious solution to violence or oppression. It has historically led to destructive outcomes, and it certainly isn’t a good foundation for a functioning society

0