Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
It genuinely tickles my brain that when a woman flirts, dates, or has sex with more than one man…she is a sl*t and “for the streets” but a guy could sleep with 5+ women and would never get that same kind of disrespect.
upvote 86 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Idk. I’ve never got this. Promiscuity goes both ways. Some folks use the argument that some cultures men can have multiple wives, but like… in those cultures they get married they aren’t just sleeping around. Always a red flag whenever a group takes a stance of “rules for thee not for me”

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

Just not true to anyone that has logic and reason. They would both be for the streets and both should get disrespect.

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

It’s the world we live in with those “traditional values” or whatever. Idk I’m jaded lol

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 2w

It’s easier for women to get play regardless of attractiveness. It’s next to impossible for a guy to get laid unless you’re over 6’2 with a good face. Hope this helps!

upvote -2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 2w

Rules for thee, not for me.

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Real trad values would be to not sleep around, man or woman (but also neither are “for the streets” if they do) It’s the douche bag hypermasculine/hyperfeminine type that say men can be players but women have to be virgins

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

What’s hyper feminine?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Idk if that’s the right word but like the girls that are like super submissive, let their bf/husband talk for them, think women’s only job is to have kids and treat their husband, they say stuff like a good woman won’t work and judge women who do. Very toxic just like the alpha men

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

You mean permissive women? 😭

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Yeah like permissive and traditional religious women

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

I agree

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

I mean traditional religious but to an extreme. Cause you can be a trad Christian but not be like so toxic 😭

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #3 2w

Yeah I get what you mean twin

upvote 3 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

That’s the hugest load of bullshit I’ve ever heard

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

You’re obviously a man and obviously don’t know what you’re talking about

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

3 replies to 1 comment is crazy 😭 prove me wrong lmao don’t just say it’s bullshit when you know I’m right

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Ok, tell me why you think it’s right.

upvote 0 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

You’re the one calling my comment bullshit - tell me why you think that genius 😂

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

No :) you make the claim, you have to defend it. I’ll respond then :)))

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Source: look at couples everywhere around you irl, not online

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Enjoy :)) notice how it’s actual sources and not just “look around you irl bro”. Look up hypergamy too, my original comment will make a lot more sense

post
upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

Can you send me the link please?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

1st link - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347213001590 2nd link - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020 3rd link - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15994722/

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 2w

Let me know your thoughts when you’re done reading through them

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #4 2w

also i dont think this is necessarily true and this is just what men assume, sure there are girls that like taller guys and men with good faces but typically i dont think they have the standards you said. If you think about it, do you ever see a good looking man with a less attractive girl? Not really, ive basically never seen that. But i see all the time pretty girls with below average men, women need to raise their standards in my opinion…

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

It’s true, the data doesn’t lie. Short guys aren’t even considered as potential partners for the majority of women. Like I told the other person just seeing trends irl is not a reliable source. Even then, I have seen the exact opposite irl where several plus size women had partners that were fit. Why do you think women need to raise their standards? A lot of them already won’t date a man that’s short even tho that’s something we can’t control. If anything men need to raise their standards

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 2w

Bro 💀 maybe it’s because below the surface they’re good people… I don’t think you want to date an attractive person who is an asshole or unloyal, instead of a homely person who is the sweetest and most loyal ever

upvote 1 downvote