Anonymous #3 4d

How is this any different than that age formula many of y’all use

-9

Anonymous #5 4d

I think the equation thing is dumb, too, but he said “more than,” not “equal to.”

14

Anonymous #5 4d

You would have to be 13 for that to be the case in the equation

17

Anonymous #4 4d

No there is a whole number + .25 I’m not asking about the whole number. Also it would be -.25 if I was 13

2

Anonymous #5 4d

Can you tell me where you are seeing a .25 and not a .75x I can’t tell if you are serious rn

9

Anonymous #4 4d

19*0.75=14.25

1

Anonymous #1 4d

Exacto

1

Anonymous #5 4d

I see. Just round then doesn’t change the idea

1

Anonymous #4 4d

what r u talking about?

10

Anonymous #8 4d

Simple Google search if you thought I was making it up. You’ll find plenty of vids almost exclusively women talking about their support of this “rule”

0

Anonymous #5 4d

Considering nobody here should be talking to anyone under 18 i think it’s fine that it falls apart in the teens😭 it’s still a wild equation though 😭

5

Anonymous #4 4d

LMAOAOAOAOAO I remember my (guy) friends telling me (also a guy) about this in like 10th grade this isn’t like a real thing

10

Anonymous #4 4d

the barney rule? from how i met your mother? what about it?

9

Anonymous #1 4d

yeah it was made popular in how i met your mother. barney (the sex addict / sex pest) uses this rule. idk why #4 thinks this is something women made popular i'm pretty sure it's like a half joke that mostly men say

9

Anonymous #8 4d

Wrong again

-2

Anonymous #4 4d

Me when I can’t read

9

Anonymous #4 4d

that says where it came from lmao, not how it became popularized

13

Anonymous #1 4d

My only assertion is that this equation the guy in the OP has isn’t any worse in nature than this age gap one that is all

-1

Anonymous #4 4d

No because your age is something that is always changing

2

Anonymous #7 4d

I’d need a source then. The entire article doesn’t mention the show and it would if it were so relevant as they say

-2

Anonymous #1 4d

Age is present in both equations wtf are you even saying 💀

-2

Anonymous #4 4d

Yeah but it’s not the quantifier

1

Anonymous #4 4d

Your age represents your stage of life, a 45 year old could have a body count of 50 but that doesn’t tell you anything about their life

2

Anonymous #1 4d

A persons body count in relation to their age tells you as much if not more than the age gap of a relationship

-2

Anonymous #4 4d

A 45 year old could have the same body count as a 26 year old and you’d know nothing about who they are now.

3

Anonymous #1 4d

If you think that that’s cool. But you’d have to admit if I told you two people are dating person and they have a 20 year age game 20 and 40. You also couldn’t derive any more info either

-1

Anonymous #4 4d

I know they’re in completely different stages of their life and I wouldn’t recommend it, but who am I to stop them

6

Anonymous #1 4d

Why is it so hard for you to just agree that you cannot derive any more info from either scenario given they are hypothetical persons you don’t know. Like you’re going in circles without even explaining why the equations aren’t of similar nature

-1

Anonymous #4 4d

If someone has 10 bodies when they’re 19 why is that worse than when they’re 45?

7

Anonymous #1 4d

That question has nothing to do with anything I’ve asked

-1

Anonymous #4 4d

wtaf are you yapping about? please tell me you don't take *either* of these seriously... you realize following either of these formulas is statutorily unsound advice, right?

8

Anonymous #8 4d

That is precisely my point they are equivalent in nature

-3

Anonymous #4 4d

ok... but again... why did you bring it up in response to somebody saying ppl won't let women live? you're the only person who's invested in this formula...

8

Anonymous #4 3d

My heavens some of you are so unintelligent it hurts to read. "What about this formula women use huh? How's it any different 🤨" This is what we call begging the question, which is a logical fallacy. The premise of your argument *wrongly* assumes women use this formula regularly/commonly. They don't! A bunch of ppl had to confirm that you were talking about the BARNEY formula followed by *everybody* agreeing it's an unserious rule that nobody follows. Please stop taking urself seriously

4

Anonymous #12 3d

also note that these formulas are not the same "in nature" and it should be very clear why. the barney formula is a permission structure, whereas the body count (bc) formula is not. at no point does the bc formula say "it's okay for you to sleep with this person" but the barney formula does. the bc formula is purely for judgement, whereas the barney formula is for permission

3

Anonymous #4 3d

so no, not equivalent in nature 😂

4

Anonymous #8 3d

Not even close to equivalent. They're comparable in that they're both arbitrary formulas to judge women. That's where the similarities start and end

6