Anonymous strawberry_hair 1w

Women refusing to have kids. Refusing to fuel the government human trafficking machine. But it seems that most women are unwilling to compromise such a life choice for political ends. So we should pick another strategy.

1

Anonymous #4 1w

I wish you a healthy pregnancy and many years with your child

7

Anonymous OP 1w

I mean I understand the feeling but on the other hand why should we have to compromise for something like this. Some women might do this, but others won’t. I think most women not dating or being with conservative men is more effective than anything else.

7

Anonymous #4 1w

I wish you luck!

8

Anonymous strawberry_hair 1w

True, it helps, but it still doesn’t take out all the liberal traffickers. I want to get THEM ALL

1

Anonymous #5 1w

I was thinking something like a single year where the birth rate is maybe half what it normally is. You’ll see the effects for decades. Schools will be looking for more kids in that grade, scholarships will fall into their laps, and companies will have to deal with changes in the labor market as they age. It would send a message.

2

Anonymous #5 1w

And the message would be, “If our children are for sale, then we will not have them”

2

Anonymous #5 1w

People who want a certain number of kids can still have them, but maybe that’s the year to adopt or they just wait till next year to conceive

2

Anonymous #2 1w

That’s why they are threatening to put women without kids in “marriage camps”? Thats why they are threatening to charge women over 30 without kids 17k in taxes?

7

Anonymous #6 1w

Hold on, what?

2

Anonymous #6 1w

When did this become a thing?

5

Anonymous OP 1w

It’s the new heritage foundation thing

6

Anonymous #6 1w

The corporate greed thinktank? Why am I not surprised?

2

Anonymous #6 1w

Though that foundation can kick rocks I’m not seeing anything about a tax or forcing women into boot camps though I wouldn’t be surprised if that was an end goal

1