Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
To be clear I am against this guy pressuring her for an abortion, it’s her choice. But Why are we telling this guy “you chose to have sex deal with the consequences” isn’t that exactly what people say to us about abortion. Or is this sub anti abortion?
This post is unavailable
upvote 7 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 14w

Abortion is a way of dealing with the consequences

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 14w

My problem is how he is reacting. He said he hopes she has a miscarriage. That's insane. Also he is trying to convince her. If she has one, that's fine, but that's her decision. We don’t know if she wants to keep this baby or not, or maybe go through the pregnancy and then put the kid up for adoption. We don’t know the full story

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14w

If that’s what she wants, or if she doesn’t want that the consequence is the child

upvote 4 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14w

I’m not exactly for the way some of them are talking about it, more like it’s an unfortunate situation and it’s her choice, but he’s being so gross that at the same time I don’t care

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14w

Yeah and so is not being present in the child’s life for him. Like she can abort, he can not be a parent, but people are telling him to step up because he chose to have sex and knew this could be a consequence

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14w

I very much don’t think this guy should be in this child’s life for the child’s wellbeing atp anyways, if this is even real

upvote 2 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14w

Exactly

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14w

But even if he was more rational, her situation would be raising a child she chose to keep by herself and also paying a lot for that child, and his would be help paying for that child but not having to be in its life because he didn’t want it. I think that sounds rational.

upvote 5 downvote