
Didn’t open the original thread, was about to comment “damn wtf would make you bring that up when the prompt was abt height”… which kinda gave me a moment of realization like damn every time Im shocked at a woman saying something about men it’s always reactionary to something worse a man said
Bruh look at that dude in the original post and tell me, in complete sincerity, you don’t think that guy is rage baiting. If one is arguing “the original comments were in response.. “ they’d severely lack media literacy and the ability to think critically about the bias and agenda an author may have
You’re trying to use logic to make a point in defense of oOP, however oOP was being neither logical or reasonable as they were actively engaging in rage baiting. You’re trying to look at this as though all members of the discourse are rational and reasonable human beings when in reality one member is actively engaging in irrational and unreasonable behavior with the intent of provocation.
You wouldn't call black people "blacks," disabled people "disableds," or queer people "queers." It sounds very derogatory to reduce someone to one part of their identity like that, as if they aren't people first and foremost. That's why we say "___ people." Another word for "female people" is women (or girls).