
I mean yeah but it also gives power to for-profit corporations with self-serving interests. They are ultimately not acting in the best interests of men or women, and I think giving these tech companies all that power by making it socially taboo to approach people in person is a mistake.
No? And even if they were, nightclubs aren’t the only place you can meet women irl. I see your point about filtering out those she isn’t interested in who she has to worry about reacting violently to being rejected. If we were to move towards dating apps, I’d at least like one owned by a non-profit organization rather than a for-profit company. I still think virtualization has been a net negative for society though.
I think the solution should be to address violent and abusive behavior by men and make that unacceptable, and vastly reduce the likelihood of women experiencing violence when rejecting men they aren’t interested in, rather than making it unacceptable to meet or approach people irl in a respectful manner.
Of course women don’t want to be harassed! #4 said “Dating apps we live in the 21st century that’s the only place people go to specifically meet others” though, which implies #4 doesn’t think it’s acceptable or appropriate for men to go up and introduce themselves to women irl, even if respectfully. I think #4’s comments and reply to you makes that evident that is their pinion.
It’s about a man thinking he’s entitled to interrupt a woman’s routine. By making it taboo to approach women in public or ruin friendships and replacing that with dating apps, women get some more agency and find men to talk to that they would actually want. Also there’s so many other women talking about this on tiktok this isn’t a fringe belief
Also, most men who approach women are not intentionally trying to interrupt a women’s routine when they don’t want to be bothered. Some women actually do want to be approached in public, and while it is sometimes possible to distinguish by nonverbals like them having earbuds in, being perpetually on their device, or averting your gaze, it’s not always possible to accurately distinguish who is open to meeting new people or not without actually going up to them and introducing yourself.
You seem to suggest that consent should be required to go up to someone and introduce oneself, and if you believe that consent should be required in order to ask for consent to interact with someone new, then I see how that naturally leads to the conclusion of limiting meeting people to online spaces. However, this seems very limiting to me, and I disagree with the premise.
Consent requires communication, and while there is a certain progression of things, if you make any form of communication require consent in advance, that’s a bit of a catch-22. To the extent that women don’t feel comfortable communicating when they aren’t interested in interacting and want to be left alone to their routine, I believe the solution is to prevent men from reacting poorly to being told such, rather than preventing men from initiating interactions irl to begin with.