Anonymous #1 2w

Yepppp

25

Anonymous strawberry_hair 2w

Yeah I’m surprised that ones missing, I guess they figured it goes with the home ownership

25

Anonymous OP 2w

The credit card lead to the home ownership.

34

Anonymous #3 2w

(M) Just cuz you have the right to do something doesn’t automatically give you the ability to abuse it. You can be staunchly pro life; and still be pro choice, the conversation just happens with a woman having a voice in the conversation.

36

Anonymous #6 2w

the most shocking one for me is that women couldnt own a business on their own until 32 years ago 😭 that was RECENT

16

Anonymous #1 2w

How?

3

Anonymous #8 2w

If a woman can’t work, a woman can’t leave. If anything what you’re upholding is propaganda to keep women in weak positions so men can get away with abuse and treating humans as property. I love my bf, I plan to someday be a wife and mother, but I will never drop my own income because I’ve seen a thousand times over the fates of women without means to sustain themselves. Our current capitalist economy is an issue, but not one made by women working. There have always been women working,

42

Anonymous OP 2w

The difference is now we can demand equal treatment and at least fight back against harassment and exploitation

20

Anonymous OP 2w

Well for one y’all are forced to work now cause our economy sucks. There’s no going back at this point. As for the whole women being stuck in abusive relationships part, just got to choose better partners. Fathers and brothers were more involved in the past with helping women choose their suitors because they could see bad partners objectively. Abuse definitely existed don’t get me wrong, but it wasn’t the norm for most relationships.

-9

Anonymous #8 2w

how does it feel to have negative brain cells, I’m curious

32

Anonymous #7 2w

How does it feel to be unable to debate logically and just throw insults because of your feelings. You’re the idiot.

-9

Anonymous #8 2w

chill out man, it’s just words on a screen. maybe you’re arguing against divorce because you’re the type to abuse your loved ones. food for thought. and I’m insulting you because you have a subhuman mindset and aren’t worth my time <3

32

Anonymous #7 2w

And yet you’re replying to me😉. I treat my loved ones great actually <3 you can ask her

-8

Anonymous #8 2w

show her your comment about women’s rights lil bro <3 see if she stays a loved one

19

Anonymous #7 2w

She agrees<3

-6

Anonymous #8 2w

idk why I expected you to not blatantly lie on the internet, but ig that’s to be expected from a creature like you. you’ve ceased to be funny, I hope you have the day you deserve

14

Anonymous #7 2w

Wow, you need a hug or something damn. And it wasn’t a lie

-4

Anonymous #8 2w

Hey so I actually love living alone and supporting myself without a man or family.. we no longer literally depend on men, plus IM GAY

16

Anonymous #8 2w

Also back when this was a thing and women couldn’t work, women were not happy. In fact women were all drugged up on anti depressants back then

24

Anonymous #9 2w

Good for you that’s great. I was moreso speaking generally and not so much about exceptions to the rule. Being gay kinda makes you automatically not part of the rule

-3

Anonymous #9 2w

Depends which decade you’re referring to. I don’t think that was the case for all of the 1900s

-3

Anonymous #8 2w

But there were no exceptions to women not being able to work buddy.. gay women would still be trapped having to depend on a man

13

Anonymous #8 2w

I love working, most women love working.

16

Anonymous #8 2w

So basically your logic is, sure women were majorly unhappy and put on antidepressants and queer women were forced into heterosexual relationships they didn’t want but hey women didn’t have to work! Fuck off

16

Anonymous #1 2w

Lmao that is so far from the truth. Almost every woman I know fucking hates it

-3

Anonymous #8 2w

There have always been women forced to work because the economy sucks also, there are also women who can still choose to stay home if they want. But things are at least safer to some extent for women who have to work now, and they have a hope of earning enough for themselves to survive on

16

Anonymous #8 2w

Well you know some sad lazy women (the exception)

9

Anonymous #8 2w

Most of us want independence

7

Anonymous #8 2w

WOWWIE like 2 people! Also if we were forced to stay at home we would be abused, raped, and STILL HAVE TO WORK. You think household chores, full time parenting, and 3 meals a day on the table is easy? Put some lead in your head and save the gene pool

17

Anonymous #8 2w

And that’s the WHOLE THING yeah in order to not be in an abusive relationship we need to choose better partners. In order to be able to do that we NEED TO BE ABLE TO SURVIVE ON OUR OWN. Not just accept whatever man will keep us alive. Also we need to be able to CHOOSE, it used to be families chose for the daughter half the time

18

Anonymous #9 2w

“All women I know hate working” whist all the women in this comment section are telling bro otherwise 🥴

12

Anonymous #9 2w

Okay so 2 feminist morons = all women. Got it. Idk how y’all blow up with anger and hate just because of a different opinion from yours that was just supposed to be a civil debate and not disrespectful in any way. Y’all are rude af and can fuck yourselves

-3

Anonymous #8 2w

The issue is you try to force that opinion on the rest of us

19

Anonymous #8 2w

Expecting a “civil debate” as you suggest stripping our rights away from us? This isn’t debate class bro go fuk yourself

23

Anonymous #9 2w

I did not force anything, that’s a flat out lie. I just threw my opinion out there. Chill tf out

-5

Anonymous #8 2w

Your opinion is “women should be forced to stay at home and not work” tho

29

Yeah you have the freedom to share your opinions and I have the freedom to call you a dumb little boy and tell you to fuck off🫶🏻

19

Anonymous #9 2w

That’s not necessarily my stance, but you’re not intelligent enough understand my pov ig.

-3

Anonymous #9 2w

Hope your period ends soon, Jesus Christ lady

-4

Anonymous #8 2w

Well I for one don’t get a period, let a woman stay home if she wants to, marry a woman who wants that but I’m actually going to do something with my life instead of being a piece of ass who is as dumb as a man

15

Anonymous #1 2w

lol I don’t get my period either! Yay for birth control access

21

Anonymous #1 2w

As in SAVE?

6

Anonymous #8 2w

A simple Google search would tell you how..

23

Anonymous #11 2w

Yes

6

Anonymous #12 2w

You could also just tell us too. Educate the ignorant, don’t disparage them. Will google standby…

14

Anonymous #11 2w

It’s not my job to educate the ignorant, especially when you can educate yourself nowadays.

2

Anonymous #8 2w

The SAVE act will most likely sadly be turned into law. It’s supposed to help “protect” our polls as we have a “surge” of noncitizens voting (I believe the stat was 0.3% I could be wrong). So to “protect” all voters must firstly re-register to vote regardless if you’re already registered, and your current passport, or license names have to match your birth certificate.Now comes the problem as most (not all)married women have their partners last name,or is hyphenated which means they can’t vote

31

Anonymous #1 2w

This also extends out to trans voters but is essentially a tactic to minimize blue voters (most women vote blue and most LGBTQ members vote blue)

31

Anonymous #12 2w

If you find the one good NPR article, sure. Looks like SAVE will pose issues for married women like #1 said. Classic disenfranchisement from voting regulation bills. Republics don’t realize these “common sense” laws which require documentation have extremely significant “devil in the details” implications since you could change the election by blocking voters. No wonder trump wants this passed so badly. It’ll probably pass too since it already passed the house… Hello fascism

20

Anonymous #11 2w

No they do realize they’re blocking voters. It’s completely intentional and this point has been brought up multiple times and they do not care. It’s made to suppress the votes

22

Anonymous #1 2w

Put some lead in your head, I’m stealing tf out of that. AND it works perfectly here. Good job 👏🏻

11

Anonymous #12 2w

You are so fucking badass and intelligent just say what the fuck ur talking about instead of typing that re tarded comment

-1

Anonymous #15 2w

Incorrect but try again another time

8

Bodily autonomy sweetheart is in fact, a constitutional right. Ask the dead mom who stripped hers when she was forced to be an incubator without consent for a baby that died

8

Anonymous #1 2w

Luckily it can’t pass. It will be endlessly filibustered in the senate. Dems prevent a supermajority so they won’t less it come to a vote The filibuster is once again one of the last holds against fascism…

17

Anonymous #11 2w

are we seriously still saying the SAVE act somehow makes it women can’t vote when you literally need documentation of a name change (like a marriage certificate) for SO MANY THINGS. like doing taxes, getting a loan, getting a passport, getting a DRIVERS LICENSE. are we saying women are too stupid to hold onto their marriage certificate? bsfr. requiring it one time when you register to vote is NOT an issue

-3

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

the SAVE act does not make it so your name has to match your birth certificate. it just means you have to present DOCUMENTATION of your name change, like your MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE, when you register to vote. This not hard and again its already required for a ton of other things

-3

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

What if you lose your marriage certificate? You have to get a new one. Guess what? That reprint costs money. Boom you just created a poll tax. Shit happens. The government demands original documents. Tornados, flood, disasters, termites, humid weather eats documents. What about homeless people? They should be able to vote.

9

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

If you’re gonna do voter ID, you MUST GUARANTEE the IMPOSSIBILITY of disenfranchisement. Ie digital documents are accepted. Ie documentation of ID can always be obtained free of charge (state IDs can be free but drivers licenses are certainly not). Most states aren’t gonna do those things. Especially broke states

5

Anonymous #11 2w

I’m so glad I have “twirling tornado” blocked

11

Anonymous #11 2w

first of all, who loses their marriage certificate?? second of all, if you do its literally only $10-30 to get a whole new certified copy and you can get it online, by mail, or in person. i could literally sit on the side of the road with a sign for 30 min and someone would give me $30. stop acting like it’s any sort of barrier to married women to require documentation of their marriage certificate to vote

-5

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

You have clearly never panhandled dude. If you’re homeless and flat broke, are you really gonna spend that $30 on a piece of paper to vote once and wait another 2 years?? Instead of food? Clothing? Fucking stupid. ALSO. That’s a $30 poll tax which is already unconstitutional. But only married women who have changed their name have to pay it!!! Discrimination by gender is also unconstitutional. The founding fathers say “fuck off”

11

Anonymous #9 2w

she’s actually scum dude

8

Anonymous #4 2w

perfect frontline warriors for the defense of ISRAEL

-6

Anonymous #3 2w

Why?

1

Anonymous #11 2w

First of all, there’s not even a $30 fee unless you LOSE your marriage certificate. how many people do you know who have actually lost that?? MOST people keep track of it. Second of all, you’re now saying that homeless broke married women who lost their marriage certificate can’t vote. Which is VERY different from saying “it targets all married women” hmm

-1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

third of all, lots of places have fee waivers for people who can’t pay them and homeless shelters and nonprofits have programs that will pay for them as well. focus should be on supporting those programs so they can actually get their documentation which also helps them in the long run to get jobs etc.

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

people complaining that they found a way to save her baby when she literally died is insane to me. Like obviously she wanted that baby and was carrying it for a reason. Everyone is mad that her FAMILY couldnt decide to kill the baby for her after she died

0

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

Fires, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, floods, lightning, theft, to name a few causes of how someone could easily lose a piece of paper you absolute privilege dumbass

11

Anonymous #3 2w

Is it because Israel has saved 33,000 women and girls from ever experiencing sexism again?

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

Baby’s are basically tumors until they’re born

4

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

The baby wasn’t even viable at that point. Her family has to foot the bill for something they think she wouldn’t have wanted. Her body was decaying while they pumped her full of chemicals to keep the baby alive. We don’t even know if the baby will be able to live.

3

Anonymous #10 2w

Interesting statement with no evidence to back it up

-2

Anonymous #1 2w

Please state the exact place in the constitution it says that, and quote it

-2

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

That baby is still in the nicu and is expected to never actually live. That’s called a warn crime

8

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

This is just the start. Next you fucking bitch are going to say “oh well why not use all brain dead women as incubators, after all they’re not actually people just breeders”

11

Anonymous strawberry_hair 2w

wrong! Chance, the baby, was able to go home Feb. 19th and is doing well although he is still on oxygen! 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️

-2

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

also she clearly wanted HER baby that she was purposely carrying 🙄 why should her family get to kill him??

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

Maybe check ur sources first

-1

Anonymous #1 2w

i’m not saying all brain dead anything. im saying if a pregnant MOTHER becomes brain dead but the doctors are still able to save her baby for her, that is clearly a GOOD THING 💀

0

Anonymous #1 2w

Ok then u literally just REQUEST A NEW ONE LMFAO

-1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

Look at her beautiful baby Chance. Obviously his mother would have wanted him to have this chance at life (no pun intended). Thank goodness the doctors refused to listen to her family who just wanted him dead instead!

-1

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

“thank God the doctors didn’t listen to the family and committed a war crime” I hope the doctors don’t listen to yours when they pull the plug on you

3

Anonymous twirling_tornado 2w

And I don’t mean they left you plugged in.

1