Sidechat icon
Join communities on Sidechat Download
Where is the line between thinking about someone sexually and reducing that person only to sex?
upvote 8 downvote

default user profile icon
Anonymous 18h

Has a lot to do with the way u treat them

upvote 15 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 17h

exactly as it sounds. if you think of someone sexually in sexual contexts, that's perfectly fine. if you think of them ONLY sexually, then you have reduced them to that.

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16h

if you think about them only for sex then you have reduced them down to only sex but if it’s sex and something more then there more so it’s not just sex

upvote 1 downvote
🐽
Anonymous 15h

Thinking about someone sexually is mentally walking yourself through the experience WITH them. Reducing them to sex is thinking of them more like an object that brings you satisfaction.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous 16h

The line being who identify themselves by their sexuality first. Like it’s getting weird

upvote -1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #1 18h

And the difference between the way you treat them is?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Never mind, it’s hard to explain

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

it's really not tbh

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

If I see someone I’m sexually attracted to but have never met, I can only think about them sexually, since I don’t know them as a person. And if they don’t want to talk to me, that stays true. I still don’t know who they are, so sexual attraction is all I have to go on.. so at that point I’m only ever reducing them to sex because I don’t know them.. and in the other circumstance they don’t know me

upvote 10 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 17h

then yes, you have reduced that person to sex. what's unclear?

upvote 14 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 17h

Is that a bad thing?

upvote 5 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 16h

I would say it's inherently dehumanizing but if you keep it entirely to yourself, it's not like it's going to harm anyone. probably not a thought process you should lean into, though

upvote 11 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Have you ever wanted to have sex with someone that you didn’t know?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

I've had crushes on people but I certainly wouldn't phrase it like you just did

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Have you ever thought about someone in the context of sex and you did not know them personally?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

The point is that I would not think about them *only* in the context of sex, which is what *reducing* them to sex means

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

What other context would you be thinking about somebody that you don’t know in that coincides with thoughts of them as it relates to sex?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

I don't know what you mean. If I saw someone I didn't know and was attracted to them, I would be thinking about what I could say to them or what I could infer about their life from how they're dressed, or wondering where they're going or what they do for work or something. a thousand things other than sex.

upvote 6 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Do you have a healthy relationship with sex?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

I guess?

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Are you demisexual?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

No

upvote 8 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 15h

Interesting… I guess we’re just two different people. Because if I’m sexually attracted to someone, I’m only thinking about them in a sexual context. If I’m romantically attracted to someone, I’ll think about them in a romantic context. But if I’m just sexually attracted to someone and I don’t know them at all, everything on my mind about them will be related to sex…. But for you, it’s different ig

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 15h

well yeah I assume that's why you asked the question. I think the idea that you would see someone and be instantly romantically attracted to them but not sexually attracted to them, or the inverse, seems very strange. those concepts are unified in my mind. obviously I can't speak for anyone else but I feel like I've generally heard it discussed in similar terms by other people.

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #2 14h

I think if romantic feelings come first, I might be able to unify them. But they’re not always unified. When it’s time for sex with a romantic partner, the romantic part of my attraction isn’t always active in that moment

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14h

if you care about them, their feelings, & their satisfaction beyond how they’re useful to you. if you see it as a mutual thing (e.g. caring if they want the same thing), then I don’t believe you’re reducing them

upvote 9 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> OP 14h

maybe you’re demiromantic?

upvote 1 downvote
default user profile icon
Anonymous replying to -> #6 14h

or even just grayromantic. or just not ready for a relationship. there’s a lot of possibilities that aren’t necessarily dehumanizing. if there’s a dissonance in how you feel and how you want to feel (e.g. if you would like to want romance with that person), then I don’t think you’re sexualizing them

upvote 4 downvote