
If I see someone I’m sexually attracted to but have never met, I can only think about them sexually, since I don’t know them as a person. And if they don’t want to talk to me, that stays true. I still don’t know who they are, so sexual attraction is all I have to go on.. so at that point I’m only ever reducing them to sex because I don’t know them.. and in the other circumstance they don’t know me
I don't know what you mean. If I saw someone I didn't know and was attracted to them, I would be thinking about what I could say to them or what I could infer about their life from how they're dressed, or wondering where they're going or what they do for work or something. a thousand things other than sex.
Interesting… I guess we’re just two different people. Because if I’m sexually attracted to someone, I’m only thinking about them in a sexual context. If I’m romantically attracted to someone, I’ll think about them in a romantic context. But if I’m just sexually attracted to someone and I don’t know them at all, everything on my mind about them will be related to sex…. But for you, it’s different ig
well yeah I assume that's why you asked the question. I think the idea that you would see someone and be instantly romantically attracted to them but not sexually attracted to them, or the inverse, seems very strange. those concepts are unified in my mind. obviously I can't speak for anyone else but I feel like I've generally heard it discussed in similar terms by other people.
or even just grayromantic. or just not ready for a relationship. there’s a lot of possibilities that aren’t necessarily dehumanizing. if there’s a dissonance in how you feel and how you want to feel (e.g. if you would like to want romance with that person), then I don’t think you’re sexualizing them